Morning:
8°c
Is there still a Big Four? A question worth asking after a weekend in which none of them won, and two could only draw at home against relatively lowly opposition.
As things stand Aston Villa, with, let it be trumpeted the length and breadth of the land, 10 Englishmen in the team, scored four, and have insinuated themselves into fourth spot.
That leaves Martin O'Neill's side just one point behind Manchester United, who on their travels have netted only eight goals in as many matches.
After Sunday's dour draw against West Ham, a game notable for little more than the terrific reception the home fans afforded to Gianfranco Zola and Steve Clarke, Chelsea have dropped 14 points at the Bridge, unprecedented in recent seasons.
The day before, Liverpool went two down at Anfield against Hull, and needed a bit of help from the ref to draw level. The sign in the players' tunnel, 'This is Anfield', that used to strike fear into the hearts of visitors, hasn't done so for many a long year now.
As for Arsenal, least said soonest mended.
They have already lost five times, and look well off the pace. Their goal difference is a mere nine, compared to Chelsea's 29, and it's hard to disagree with their former captain Patrick Vieira's assessment that no one is afraid of the Gunners any more. I appreciate this is the wrong point in the season to write off the Big Four and I'm not doing so. February and March are when their big squads literally and metaphorically kick in, and the chances must still be that the Big Four will reassert themselves then.
But, I suggest, it will be only after the sort of struggle unheard of in the recent past, especially since the only Premier League club with serious money to spend at the January sales is likely to be under-achieving Manchester City.
All the Big Four have cash concerns going forward that are bound to impact on the pitch.
Roman Abramovich appears to have shut his wallet and the Glazers' capacity to service the massive debts they have imposed on Manchester United without cuts on the playing side may be increasingly called into question
Meanwhile, Liverpool's American owners face a tough time with the Royal Bank of Scotland over renewing their £350million loan next month.
In match after match in the Premier League this season the minnows have refused to be swallowed by the sharks.
This has to be for the good of the game overall. Whether it points to any lasting change, however, remains to be seen.
Reader views (2)
I'm all in favour of a more evenly balanced Premier League but if this is because some managers outside the Four have decided to "park the bus" and hope for the point when playing them, then it is to the paying public's detriment and they'd be better off watching an "attack versus defence" training session than paying a day's wages to see one of the "elite" play one of the "unclean". The Arsenal v Man U game this season was great to watch, a couple of heavyweights "slugging it out" until the end. Newcastle and Spurs placing 11 men on Chelsea's goal line so as to get a point, was not!
- Paul, Twickenham, London, UK, 17/12/2008 16:05
Report abuse
I disagree. I think Chelsea's bad home form is symptamatic of losing their first home game in four years. They have won 8 away games on the troy - that's hardly a weakness.
As for Man Utd, they have played away to Liverpool, Chelsea, Arsenal, Villa, Man City, Everton already this season, which explains why they have less points than usual.
Only Arsenal are crap. I suspect the top three is as strong as ever, forget the rest.
- James, London, 17/12/2008 14:54
Report abuse
