Weather Tonight: 4°c Partly Cloudy Night Morning: 8°c Cloudy

News

HEADLINES:

Problems with a target culture

Evening Standard comment
17.10.07

The latest criticism of the Government's target culture comes from an unexpected source. The Chief Constable of Surrey, Bob Quick, has told this paper that his force's rating as the best performing in the country is misleading because it is based on achieving Government targets to increase "the number of offenders brought to justice" by focusing operations on soft targets. "We are," he said, "not doing as well as it seems."

In particular, he suggests - as many people have suspected - that police are issuing far more cautions to shoplifters and cannabis users, and fixed penalty notices for disorderly behaviour, rather than engaging with serious crimes. "We are at risk of claiming statistical success when real operational issues remain to be addressed," he said.

Mr Quick's candour is admirable. He has identified the central problem with targets, which is that they can result in public service staff simply doing the minimum necessary to tick the boxes required by government, even if this means they fall short of public expectations in doing their real job. Issuing cautions for cannabis possession and shoplifting is no bad thing but this focus is damaging if it means that police then fail to deal with crimes of violence, burglary and car criminals.

He also raises another serious problem with the target culture, namely, the increasing unwillingness of the Crown Prosecution Service to bring genuinely challenging cases to court. He says that in order to diminish the number of failed prosecutions, it is dropping cases that are more difficult and less certain to result in a conviction. But it is precisely serious and persistent criminals who will exploit every available procedural and legal loophole in the system.

What is needed is more careful preparation for these cases on the part of prosecutors and police, not a risk-averse culture which produces statistical success by avoiding dealing with serious crime. Targets are meant to improve public services; instead, they risk skewing their effectiveness.

Reader views (1)

 Add your view

The buck stops with the government. Resources have been ploughed into wasteful schemes like the amalgamation of police forces and prosecuting members of the public who stand up to thugs.


- Gary, Wood Green


Add your comment

 

Your email address will not be published

Terms and conditions make text area bigger You have  characters left.


 

Don't Miss
  • Berlin Wall

    Sex, lies and the Stasi

    On this day in 1989 the Berlin Wall was finally breached, ending the reign of East Germany’s feared security service. Here Anne McElvoy, who spent much of the Eighties in the city, recalls her encounters with the spooks
  • George Pringle

    The geeky-girl solo artists descending on the music scene

    Kookiness is what sells music these days and these opinionated artists have it in spades, says Jasmine Gardner

Why Sam's in the clear over that M&S dress

At last the truth about the M&S spotted dress that Sam Cam wore to the Conservative Party Conference

All stories


Promotions

The Open University

Every year The Open University helps thousands of professionals progress in their careers.


Win the Best Seats

In London theatre when you vote for your favourite celebrity spec wearer.


Breast Cancer Care

Donate £1 and leave a message of support for a loved one in the Swarovski Garden of Wishes.


Win an iPodTouch

With Courvoisier when you share your thoughts on this week's cocktail.