£500,000 payout for failed Tube chief
Dick Murray, Transport Editor25 Oct 2007
The head of failed Tube firm Metronet is to get a £500,000 pay-off, the Evening Standard reveals today.
Four other bosses will receive £700,000 between them - and the taxpayer will foot the bill.
They were formally sacked today by Ernst & Young, the administrator now running the company which went bust because it could not control its costs.
Chief executive Andrew Lezala and the others have a week to clear their desks.
Metronet was responsible for running and upgrading two-thirds of the Tube network but passengers suffered a series of major delays and cancellations. Transport for London announced it wants to take over the operation.
Sources said Ken Livingstone had been personally involved in the departures of the executives after describing the company as "dead as Monty Python's parrot".
An industry source said: "It would be fair to say that senior management at Metronet did not enjoy the full confidence of the Mayor."
Brian Cook, chairman of TravelWatch, condemned the payments and said: "It is very regrettable that either the taxpayer or the fare payer will end up paying the bill for these people who have run a thoroughly disgraceful company."
Mr Lezala, along with the chief finance officer Philip Pacey, senior vice president (commerce) Ken Owen, senior vice president (change management) David Clark, director of communications Paul Emberley, will all stop work immediately.
They are expected to receive a year's salary. The chief financial officer is believed to have been paid at least £200,000 a year, the two senior vice-presidents around £175,000 each and the communications director around £150,000.
They will also take the pension pots they built up while with Metronet. The cash will formally be paid by Metronet on the orders of administrators Ernst & Young. A spokesman said: "We would not discuss any financial aspects of their going."
But Metronet has no funds of its own and is continuing to operate while in administration thanks to £1 billion of cash provided by Transport for London - meaning the pay-offs are effectively from public funds.
Today their severance deals were called an "award for failure" by critics who said they should have received nothing.
Although others have shown an interest in Metronet, industry observers say TfL is odds-on favourite to take over. TfL refused to say how much it is willing to pay but pledged there would be no extra cost to fare-payers.
Administrator Alan Boom will have to decide if their bid is in the best interests of Metronet's creditors. Metronet was responsible for upkeep of all the subsurface lines, including the Circle and District, along with the Bakerloo, Central and Victoria lines.
But it crashed in spectacular fashion when it failed in its demand for an extra £1 billion for extra work the company claimed it had done on the deep level routes. It was also planning to claim a similar amount for the subsurface lines.
Tim O'Toole, London Underground managing director, said: "In dealing with the collapse of Metronet, and through the administration process, we have had two priorities. First, to ensure the continued safe and reliable operation of the Tube network for passengers. Secondly, once under TfL control, we seek to put in place a stable, economic and efficient structure that is better able to deliver our investment priorities that will lead to increased capacity on the Tube in future."
Reader views (7)
I think the real headline is political agenda and a Mayor who was rather keen to see the PPP fail, due to his natural political aversion to private enterprise. I have also worked with Andy Lezala and agree with the other comments - a great leader and I doubt there is anyone more capable of delivering value to the London Underground Network.
- Robert, Macclesfield, England, 11/11/2007 23:02
Report abuse
I pay exhorbitant fees for what? Oh yeah, to line sacked employees' pockets!
- Julia Martin, Loughton, Essex, England, 06/11/2007 22:41
Report abuse
This is criminal! I suppose if Metronet lost a few billions more, Mr. Lezala would be paid double, a nice round £1 Million. Why is it that the poor taxpayer is always made a fool of?
- George, London, UK, 25/10/2007 23:37
Report abuse
I knew Andy Lezala, I used to work for him at BREL around 20 years ago. Metronet was already in trouble before he was put in charge and he was probably the best person to try to turn it around.
Patrick in Dalston, fyi Andy looks after his staff.
- Lemongrass, Stoke Newington, 25/10/2007 15:29
Report abuse
Last time this happened we paid hundreds of thousands to get a signature on a gagging clause so that the incompetence of the authorities could not be made public. I suspect this will be the case here too.
- Lawrence Dimery, London, 25/10/2007 12:40
Report abuse
And no doubt the more junior staff will get the blame, the sack and no pay off!
- Patrick Griffin, Dalston, 25/10/2007 11:54
Report abuse
Wasn't KEN involved in the appointment of these Metronet people as well ?
- Mike, Sussex, 25/10/2007 11:14
Report abuse
Morning:
9°c















