Afternoon:
15°c
London needs fruit trees just like Delhi, says Ken
Ross Lydall, City Hall Editor20 Nov 2007
Ken Livingstone has called for an extra one million trees to be planted in London to help counter the effects of global warming.
Mr Livingstone has been inspired by his opposite number in Delhi, chief minister Sheila Dikshit, who has increased the Indian capital's tree cover by 14 times in a decade.
The Mayor's plans - which received the immediate backing of the world's pre-eminent expert on climate change - are part of a wider strategy to cut the capital's emissions by 60 per cent by 2025.
He is establishing a database of species that experts believe will survive warmer weather, and wants Londoners to plant orange, olive and fig trees in their gardens.
Mr Livingstone also called on supermarkets to shade their car parks with trees to help minimise deaths from heat exhaustion during the growing risk of "desperately hot summers" but said no public money would be provided.
There are in excess of five million trees in London and the Evening Standard has been campaigning for more trees to be planted in London.
The Mayor said: "There is no point planting a tree that is going to die from the heat in 40 years. The London plane will be fine but a lot of silver birch won't make it."
The database, drawn up with the help of the Royal Horticultural Society and other experts, contains 322 species of tree, of which 25 are native to London. The Olympic Delivery Authority proposes to plant only native UK species in the Olympic Park in Stratford.
Mr Livingstone said: "Clearly there are going to be an awful lot of people growing oranges and olives. I myself get each year a small olive crop. A lot of the trees we see around the Mediterranean are going to start appearing. Fig trees are going to be brilliant. In 10 years we will be growing oranges."
The plan was praised by Dr Rajendra Pachauri, joint winner of the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize with Al Gore and chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. He told the Standard: "Firstly, it's a step to absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.
"Second, I'm sure it creates visual and environmental benefits. Children and others who in cities don't get to understand the beauty of nature are reminded about it every time they walk around."
Reader views (7)
Why? Has the GLA not got enough fruit cakes in it already?
- Trevor Roll, London, 21/11/2007 12:48
Report abuse
London needs more fruit trees! We need to get money trees, as we are now being told we are going to have a hike in our council tax to pay for the upkeep of the olympic stadiums.
- Anna, London, 21/11/2007 11:52
Report abuse
Some boroughs are already chopping down fruit trees on the basis that someone somewhere sometime might slip on their fallen leaves or fruit. Livingstone's bleatins are all quite rich, when wherever one goes in London one sees perfectly lovely streets with trees and all, destroyed by signage, road markings, off road parking. In most borough street trees seem under the control of the traffic and roads departments, says it all really.
- Helen, Norwich, 21/11/2007 09:41
Report abuse
If Ken plants fruit trees one year, the local councils will chop them down the following year because of fear of liability claims from dangerous 'falling fruit threat'.
If they chop down conker trees, they'll certainly chop down apple trees.
- Roger, London, 21/11/2007 09:21
Report abuse
Perhaps the mayor could tell Labour Lambeth to stop cutting fruit trees down. We have already lost two beautiful fruiting apple trees from our street. Why? because the council was afraid that people might slip on the windfalls and sue them! Why not just cut down every tree in the borough in case people slip on leaves?
- Sarah N., London, 20/11/2007 22:34
Report abuse
Ken Livingstone's idea about planting more trees in the capital deserves praise, as tree-lined streets and parks are part of London's beauty. However, these days it seems as if every other new sapling in the street gets snapped off by vandals if not planted in a cage of metal bars. The Victorians and Edwardians dared not plant flowers in the grass of public parks because poor people would pick and sell them, but we enjoy their legacy of trees. Somehow, people have to learn to respect and protect trees again.
- Amanda Craig, london NW1, 20/11/2007 18:36
Report abuse
He now really has to go. He is losing the plot.
- Jacqueline, Hampstead, London, 20/11/2007 17:20
Report abuse
