Afternoon:
10°c
Commuters may foot bill for extra police at Games
Martin Bentham, Home Affairs Editor9 Jan 2008
London commuters could be hit by new fare increases to pay for the policing of the transport network during the 2012 Olympics.
Services could also be cut if the Department for Transport fails to cover the £27million cost of ensuring passenger safety during the Games.
Ministers insist that negotiations about funding are continuing but sources say that police and transport companies are becoming increasingly concerned that passengers could be forced to pay some or all of the bill.
Londoners are already facing higher council tax bills to pay for the Games as well as rising costs for Tube and train travel.
British Transport Police have submitted a funding bid to cover the cost of extra officers and vehicles to cope with the thousands of additional passengers using the transport system during the Olympics.
These will be used to prevent overcrowding at key stations and tackle incidents such as vandalism that could cause delays as well as to protect against possible terrorist attacks.
A source close to the negotiations said: "We are arguing that this is a special event and it should be paid for by a one-off Government grant but the signs coming out of the Department for Transport are not entirely positive.
"If the money doesn't come from the Government, then the rail operators will have to carry the cost and that means that passengers will ultimately pay. There is a lot of concern and strong views are being expressed about this privately."
Concern about the Government's attitude to meeting the costs have already been raised in the House of Lords by Lord Imbert, a former Met commissioner.
He told peers: "Transport security is a critical element in the preparation for the Olympic Games and therefore any further failure or delay in clarifying the funding provision will add unnecessary risk to the Games and their preparation, particularly at a time like this when the threat level is severe."
Labour peer Lord Rosser also urged the Government to foot the bill. The budget set by the police is intended to cover their expenditure from April this year until December 2012, months after the Games.
Under normal arrangements, British Transport Police revenue expenditure, which covers staffing and other day-today costs, is paid for by the rail companies and London Underground.
Up to 240,000 people an hour are expected to use the transport system during the peak Olympic periods and up to 1,000 police officers will be needed to marshal the crowds and keep the network operating safely.
The Department for Transport said it was unable to give any assurance that passengers would not be required to foot the security bill but added that no decision had been taken.
Reader views (9)
What else is new?
- Mike, London, 09/01/2008 15:48
Report abuse
Cheers Ken. I hope Londoners know how to thank you by electing Boris at the London Mayoral elections.
- Gerry, Chatham Kent, UK, 09/01/2008 15:26
Report abuse
I don't think I'm the only person who is beginning to wish London hadn't won the 2012 bid... yes, winning may have soothed the politicians' egos and perked up their dreams of a legacy, but what about those of who have to pay for something that will probably not end up benefiting us in the long-run (economically)?!
- Caroline, London, 09/01/2008 15:12
Report abuse
Can the government please remind me what "benefits" I will experience from the games as a taxpayer?
The only benefit I can see is another reason not to vote Liebour.
- Dave, London, 09/01/2008 14:46
Report abuse
I feel much the same as my grandmother, who cried when she saw pictures of Neville Chamberlain returning from Munich with Hitler's signature on a piece of paper, before the second world war started. She cried, just as I did when I heard London had "won" the Olympic Games. It's the only time that anyone ever won anything by drawing the short straw.
- Tony, Potters Bar, Herts, 09/01/2008 13:52
Report abuse
We're paying for police now. Where are they?
- Alan Tucker, London, 09/01/2008 13:47
Report abuse
Hold on to your wallets, as Al Jolson said "You ain't seen nothin' yet."
- R M, London, UK, 09/01/2008 13:43
Report abuse
Once again working Londoners are going to be robbed - it now seems almost accepted that we should foot any shortfall in cash that Labours big ideas create!
And some why the long term unemployed have no incentive to work!
- Annie, London, 09/01/2008 13:08
Report abuse
Another reason for cancelling these phoney games,
- John Newton, Wanstead, 09/01/2008 12:27
Report abuse
