Morning:
13°c
Mayoral aide 'wanted good news on road safety buried'
David Williams, Motoring Editor25.01.08
A senior mayoral adviser ordered the authors of a report on road safety to rewrite it so it was politically acceptable, it was claimed today.
His alleged intervention came after a three-year study by Transport for London into whether motorcyclists should be allowed to use bus lanes. A trial had found that accidents on two routes where motorbikes were allowed into bus lanes were nearly halved.
But aide Kevin Austin allegedly ordered the rewrite to avoid the loss of the "green vote", because cycle groups opposed sharing bus lanes with motorcyclists.
Now the authors fear the new version will be a whitewash and conceal the road safety benefits shown by the trial, which took place in Brixton Road and Finchley Road.
It found the bus lanes were much safer for pedestrians, cyclists, car drivers and motorcyclists when motorcycles were allowed access, with a 42 per cent fall in the rate of collisions.
The report, presented to the Mayor in September, stated this, but officials claim they have been told to "bury" the findings and rewrite key sections to show the trial produced no safety gains.
City Hall insiders allege the order came amid fears that opening up bus lanes would alienate thousands of cyclists opposed to the move.
A source told the Standard: "We have been told to cook the books and expect the new report to be a whitewash. The original report showed that the trial sites were far safer than on other 'control' roads, including for cyclists.
"It meant the Mayor would have to open up bus lanes across London, followed by other regions closely watching the experiment. Now it has to be rewritten to appear the trial sites are no safer, so the Mayor can announce he will not proceed."
The study of the trial routes found accidents directly involving motorcycles fell by 45 per cent, compared with 19 per cent increase on a nearby 'control' route. Pedestrian casualties fell by 39 per cent against a three per cent rise on control routes. Collisions between cyclists and motorcyclists fell by 44 per cent.
The draft report said: "These figures demonstrate that crashes involving powered two-wheelers and other vulnerable road-users become more infrequent even when considering the increased concentration of riders."
Cycling campaign group CTC said "noisy" motorcycles travelling at higher speeds would intimidate cyclists, threatening the increase in commuters turning to bicycles.
But the draft report said: "The measure has no tangible adverse consequences to cyclists. In contrast to the level of concern... the number of casualties from collisions between cyclists and powered two-wheelers users is remarkably small."
A spokesman for the Mayor said: "There are serious issues of safety and efficiency involved in this issue so it required proper consideration based upon the collection and analysis of the relevant evidence.
"Transport for London had concerns about the validity of some of the early results of the study. These concerns were shared by GLA officials. TfL therefore undertook further work.
"All the results will be included in a final report, which will be submitted to TfL senior management and the Mayor. A decision will be made on the basis of full consideration of all of the evidence and this will be made public."
Reader views (14)
What were Tfl's "concerns about the validity of some of the early results of the study." That they were truthful?
- Dave, London
The next thing you know, they will place the slowest bikes at the front of traffic lights to hold up the traffic. Oh, hold up, they do.
I wonder how many other studies end up being someone sat at a desk making up figures opposed to real study results. How many more figures are being adjusted to make what the political party wants? Who knows, next it will be speeding kills (even though that accounts for 0.4% of road accidents).
I wonder how many of these decision makers have ever ridden a motorcycle. I mean its terrible, they are huge bulky things, create lots of emissions, lots of traffic, and its not tricky riding them on the diesel covered London roads at all. A pain in London's rear end obviously
Britan - Home of the intelligent, but seemgly not home of the common sense.
- Damien Benton, London and UK.
Well that's about the last straw for me - I largely support Ken's politics but if his administration is happy to put my life at risk rather than admit that things are a bit more complex than 'buses and cycles good, private motor vehicles bad', then my vote will be going elsewhere.
- Tim Atkinson, London
Ken is a joker! Cyclists share bus lanes with giant buses but not with motorcycles - where is the real danger?
I am both a cyclist and motorcyclist and I believe these bus lanes should be de-restricted as soon as possible. Cyclists need protection from larger vehicles not motorbikes and this can only be done with improved road layouts and more cycle lanes.
- James, London
In Hull our bus lanes permit motorcycles. Figures must exist as to their success or failure. The observation that one trial lane expanded to all suggests success.
- Mike Hammond, Hull Yorkshire
It will not only affect the cyclists pedestrians will also be at risk from the motorcycles.
- Mike Melbourne, Bedford England
Why are these public employees, who wilfully manipulate the truth for self-serving political purposes, not summarily dismissed without feather-bed pension or other benefits?
- John Tremayne, Oxon, UK
Bus lanes are supposed to speed bus traffic. So isn't it ridiculous to watch a pedal cyclist, wobbling along at about 2mph with a caravan of buses in his wake. I saw this the other day, and it's not unusual.
- Smithy, london
Dont worry London, a few short months and you will be well rid of "Sheriff" Ken, and his motley band of chancers.
- Steve Lloyd, swansea UK
I look forward to CTC changing their stance on this subject as it now appears allowing motorcyclists into bus lanes will actually make things SAFER for the people they claim to represent.
Obviously they won't, because like Livingstone and his cronies, they have their own agenda.
Ken will publish his report and use it to justify not allowing 'bikers' into the bus lane. Then someone in America will discover a new type of fuel and the dumb/clever balance is restored.
- Steve, London
The GLA are playing with the lives of people here for political gain. When are they going to realise that they were elected to look after the lives of Londoners not look after their seats.
How many people have died because of this?
- Darren Anderson, Southwark London
As a cyclist I find that the biggest hazard comes not from motor cycles in bus lanes but from illegal parkers.
- Patrick Griffin, Dalston
London is not for the people but for Ken & his merry gang of over paid jobsworths.
- R Ellis, sidmouth
Why am I not surprised, having initially promised an 18 month trial period, which has been extended again and again because the results don't seem to suit the politics?
So the quest for votes and appearing "green" comes before injuries and death to motorcyclists and cyclists.
- Neil Harrison, London
