Morning:
8°c
Commuters on track for 100,000 extra seats
Jason Beattie, Chief Political Correspondent30 Jan 2008
Full details of a plan to ease overcrowding on London's busiest rail routes have been unveiled by the Transport Secretary.
Ruth Kelly has ordered rail operators to provide an extra 100,000 seats for commuters. The move was hailed as a victory for the Evening Standard's A Seat For Every Commuter campaign when it was announced in October. Today, it emerged that 1,300 extra carriages will be introduced across the network.
Network Rail has been told to provide longer platforms to accommodate the extra carriages and ensure rail operators can run more trains at peak times.
Ms Kelly said £10 billion would be spent on increasing capacity over the next six years following an unprecedented 40 per cent growth in passenger numbers over the last decade.
"More people than ever are travelling by train," she said. "This is a major step forward towards fulfilling our commitment to tackle overcrowding on the busiest routes and deliver real improvements."
First Capital Connect, which runs trains in Bedfordshire, Hertfordshire, Sussex and Cambridgeshire, has been asked to provide 256 more carriages.
One, which covers East Anglia, must provide 188 extra carriages; London Midland 92; c2c, which runs trains to Tilbury and Southend, 40.
South West, which covers south-west London, Surrey, Hampshire and Dorset, has to provide 105 more carriages and Southeastern, which has routes in Kent and Sussex, 110.
First Great Western, which covers Oxford and the West Country, must provide 52 and Chiltern railways has to supply 12 more.
Ms Kelly said: "Following today's publication of the rolling stock plan, Network Rail can now begin their preparations for extending platforms, depots and sidings to accommodate longer trains."
However, industry experts doubted whether the increase will keep pace with expected growth in passenger numbers.
They point out that Network Rail believes an extra 1,800 carriages are needed.
Experts also say that the Government has assumed annual passenger growth of three per cent, but some operators, such as Virgin West coast, are seeing growth as high as six per cent.
Roger Ford of Modern Railways magazine said: "A lot of trains need replacing, there was nothing about that in today's announcement."
Reader views (5)
Adding a few carriages will hardly make a difference to the trains.
And what about buses? A pity most are unrealistically designed. Many Londoners are fairly obese and therefore seats can barely cater for 2 bodies.
Rubbish public transport is a central source of angst especially in London.
- Alex, London, 26/02/2008 12:32
Report abuse
I will believe it when I see it!
I travel into London from Luton and I am standing on most journeys. We can not drive in to London as there is no where to park and the mayor is trying to encourage us to use public transport! Impossible. Fix it and we will use it !
- Tracey, Luton, 15/02/2008 13:57
Report abuse
Crowded Trains! Nothing seems to have changed. I remember in 1949 travelling to school from Hampstead to Warren Street by tube and for most of the journey my feet were not touching the ground because of the crush of people and the station personnel were pushing people in at the doorways so that the doors could close and trains leave. Stop griping and get on with it.
- Jon Vickers, UK, 13/02/2008 13:05
Report abuse
Seems to me people love the nanny state when it suits them. How can the government 'order' supposedly private operators to do anything? They might as well nationalise it then. Aren't free market principles and other 'invisible hands' supposed to take care of things like short trains, platform congestion and other infrastructure upgrades?
- Alan, Islington, 10/02/2008 21:18
Report abuse
This seems at first, like good news but it's just another promise, isn't it? What with the governments unfailing record in failing to come up with the goods and a six year completion date it could be just another forgotten and and unfullfilled promise. Well we will just have to wait and see, won't we.
- Jason Bierce, Richmond, Surrey, 04/02/2008 23:09
Report abuse
