Morning:
8°c
Tycoon sells up to escape Barratt homes
Mira Bar-Hillel, Property Correspondent28 Feb 2008
Not everyone wants to live next door to a new Barratt home - and it seems billionaire Lakshmi Mittal is among them.
As the housebuilder prepares to launch the first flats in a development in The Bishop's Avenue, Hampstead, next week, the steel tycoon has decided to sell his home, which is adjacent to the site.
He has placed his property, Summer Palace, on the market with two estate agents with an asking price of £40 million - considerably more than the £4 million to £11 million for one of the Barratt flats.
The 12 apartments are in a new building called Allingham Court at No44 in the road known locally as Millionaires Row.
The property being sold by Mr Mittal is across the road from Toprak Mansion, which was recently renamed Royal Mansion and sold to a Kazakh family for £41 million, having been on the market for two years.
The flats are nearing completion despite lengthy opposition from not only Mr Mittal but also from Barnet council. The businessman's fight began more than three years ago when the then owner of No 44, which had been standing empty for more than a decade, applied to redevelop it. She was Princess Samerah Bint Mokhtar Al-Saadawi, whose son, Prince Mokhtar Al-Saadawi, is third in line to the Saudi Arabian throne and the country's defence minister.
Mr Mittal lodged objections with the council, which rejected the plans, saying they were in breach of development policies for the area.
The princess's application was withdrawn and at the end of 2005 she sold the site to Barratt Homes for just under £19 million.
The company applied for a smaller block of flats and permission was granted in September 2006, despite Mr Mittal objecting again.
The flats are being launched as "truly luxurious and exclusive" with communal facilities, including a 24-hour concierge service, an indoor swimming pool and fitness suite, landscaped grounds with water features and underground car parking. Each apartment is described as having "sumptuous living space", with "marble, granite and limestone evident throughout".
A Barratt Homes spokeswoman said: "Purchasers can expect a level of service encountered only in the best hotels... and the whole complex is secured by electronic gates."
The asking price for Mr Mittal's house equates to £2,222 per square foot, a record for the area.
Toprak Mansion was sold for a slightly higher price but is far bigger, so the price per square foot was only £1,464.
The values of the Barratt flats fall between these two. The smallest will cost £1,600 per square foot and the biggest penthouse £1,800.
Mr Mittal's steel and glass home has nine bedroom suites, a staff flat, five reception rooms, a glass lift and an indoor swimming pool.
Trevor Abrahmsohn of Glentree Estates, which is selling it, said: "The Bishop's Avenue is a global name. It is well known to the international wealthy and for them to have a house here is the ultimate status symbol."
Reader views (8)
I am very familiar with this road. The houses in it do not appear to be "homes". Generally, they are investments for the obscenely rich. The values are obscene. Not only that, they are, in my opinion, architecturally ugly. Winnington Road (next one down) houses some beautiful homes, and if you shop a round you could pick up a bargain up for under 20 millions. I'm off down the council offices to put my name down on the list. You never know I might get put on the Hampstead waiting list and end up in living near to Bishop's and hopefully, scare a few more billionaires out of the area.
- Dr, London, England, 29/02/2008 14:15
Report abuse
I cycle up this road everyday and the amount of lorries, cement mixers, trucks and workmen wandering in the road is ridiculous. Whatever ludicrous flats they are building, I hope they get on with it, as the road is a nightmare. And before they leave, can they make sure they fill in all the potholes as well. Thanks
- Tim, London, 29/02/2008 10:39
Report abuse
Where does a citizen of an impoverished country like Kazakhstan find £41 million to buy a pad in London?
- Db, London, 29/02/2008 05:15
Report abuse
Quite right too!
- Fraser, Telford Park, 29/02/2008 01:56
Report abuse
Years ago I was involved in work on Mr Mittal's house, when he was merely super-rich: he seemed a pleasant enough bloke, and obviously hugely able. It's a very strange and rather desolate area to live, though: the most expensive street in London is constantly full of tatty builders' vans, because you can't buy there without tearing out the previous occupants' luxurious gizmos in order to install your own, if you're not tearing the whole place down, of course. Once I drove my young nephew there, just to illustrate the sheer pointlessness of having that kind of money. One doesn't get the idea that all these super-rich are constantly socialising, so it's a bit of a mystery how they instinctively end up there: after all, if you're rich enough to live there,who do you need to prove it to ?
- Mdj, Leyton, london, 29/02/2008 00:00
Report abuse
Building Apartment complexes on Bishop Avenue is a shame.
Historically that area has been designed for homes not the sort of redevelopment and environmental damage so much development is doing.
The carbon footprint of this is enormous.
Mittal's house was one of the few eco friendly houses on that street.
Shame.
- John, london.england, 28/02/2008 20:57
Report abuse
Personally I would prefer not to have a nouveau rich neighbour such as Mittal, just imagine all the security the endless parking problems of having a neighbour who is used to having parties costing millions of dollars each time.
- Nick, London UK, 28/02/2008 20:19
Report abuse
I feel so sorry for Mr Mittal having to put up with lower class neighbours!
- R.L.Cooper, Hornchurch- Essex- Greater London -London-England, 28/02/2008 17:18
Report abuse
