Morning:
8°c
CBI blasts 'rushed and confused' non-dom tax
Jim Armitage28 Feb 2008
Big business launched its most ferocious attack on the Government for years as it blasted the "ill-conceived" plans to impose extra taxes on wealthy foreigners in Britain.
The Confederation of British Industry urged Chancellor Alistair Darling to postpone the plan by at least a year and demanded a major rethink of his policy for non-domiciles.
Director general Richard Lambert said: "Ill-conceived government proposals to impose swingeing tax changes on non-doms are damaging the UK and should be scrapped and started again."
In a presentation to the Government drawn from analysis of the Treasury's own figures, the CBI said the plan would never deliver anywhere near the Government's predicted £800 million next year.
Rather, it would drive wealthy businessmen away from British shores to set up in foreign countries with more accommodating tax regimes.
Mr Lambert said: "At a time of growing economic uncertainty it is vital we do all we can to keep wealth generators and their businesses in the country, not make them feel unwelcome and drive them out."
He added: "The draft proposals have been bedevilled by problems and despite attempts to clarify some aspects there are still a plethora of outstanding issues which need to be resolved before any changes become law."
Under plans due to come into force in April, anyone who has claimed nondom status for seven of the last 10 years will have to pay an annual fee of £30,000.
Mr Lambert said: "Non-doms have been an important part of the UK's economic success and prosperity for many years, and successive administrations have provided a warm welcome. Partly as a result of their presence, London is the world's leading financial and business centre.
"The rushed and confused approach to this legislation, which appears to be driven by political and fiscal needs rather than policy principle, has been greatly damaging. Confidence in the UK as a country which does not spring nasty surprises has been undermined."
The CBI's main objections include:
The £30,000 fee should be applicable to families, not individuals, to keep the system simple and not double-tax couples.
The Treasury should work with tax authorities in the US to make sure the charge can be used by Americans against their tax returns in the US.
The Treasury should explicitly state there will be no retrospective application of the tax - one of the biggest concerns for non-doms.
The taxman should make "crystal clear" which assets held in offshore trusts will be taxed and which will not.
Reader views (2)
With so many businesses transferring to China and other developing countries, why does this government want to discourage investors from this country?
Surely, the job losses caused by these nondoms transferring business elsewhere will cost an absolute fortune compared to the £30000's paid in by those that stay.
- Rob, England, 29/02/2008 08:59
Report abuse
As with ALL New Labour plans these days, it would appear on the surface that the various departments have been given orders to "make CHANGES happen" simply because New Labour MUST be seen to be making a difference!
Is a General Election just around the corner, after all?
Regardless, it would also appear that the various departments concerned have just taken a knee-jerk reaction to these "orders" and are implementing ideas that are only half thought through and are ultimately ill-conceived and seriously flawed.
Once again it is the Tax Payers who ultimately pay the bill for not only the bad ideas but also for the salaries, benefits and expenses of all those involved in making the bad decisions! This is incredibly sad state of affairs!
- Fraser, Telford Park, 29/02/2008 01:51
Report abuse
