Weather Tonight: 9°c Light showers Morning: 14°c Overcast

News

HEADLINES:

Tell us who your donors are, Ken


25.03.08

The clearest reason for forcing all politicians to be open about the sources and extent of their funding is to establish whether there is any relation between the money they receive and the policies they adopt.

Yet in the case of the Mayor, Ken Livingstone, it is difficult to establish the precise source of his funds because donations are made, not to him directly, but to the London Labour Party. Mr Livingstone himself is not registered as a receiver of donations.

This makes it almost impossible to establish who is supporting Mr Livingstone's campaign for reelection. What is more, the rules of disclosure mean that they will only be declared in three months' time - long after the election. This is perfectly legal. It is also at odds with the whole spirit of legislation requiring transparency in funding.

The Mayor of London's influence over planning decisions is already considerable - and will be greater after this election as a result of new legislation. In 2004, two major developers, Gerald Ronson and Irvine Sellar, made personal donations to Mr Livingstone's campaign of just under £5,000, the level at which such contributions have to be made public. And, as we report today, Mr Livingstone devoted a great deal of effort to promoting Mr Sellar's flagship project, the controversial Shard of Glass skyscraper, and used council taxpayers' money to campaign for Mr Ronson's Heron Tower, which was bitterly opposed by English Heritage.

The relationship between Mr Livingstone and property developers, including Messrs Ronson and Sellar, and Tony Pidgley of Berkeley Homes, has always been a mystery. It may be that the Mayor has been perfectly disinterested in promoting their projects and fighting heritage groups and councils to get them approved. But it is important that we know who is funding Mr Livingstone's campaign.

The Tory mayoral candidate, Boris Johnson, has disclosed all donations to his campaign of over £1,000. Mr Livingstone should do no less. His secrecy over donations is contrary to the spirit of the disclosure requirements. The Electoral Commission - which has responsibility over rules governing donations - must without delay put pressure on Mr Livingstone to come clean.

Reader views (0)

 Add your view

No comments have so far been submitted.


Add your comment

 

Your email address will not be published

Terms and conditions make text area bigger You have  characters left.


 

Don't Miss
  • Lenny Henry

    Lenny Henry: 'Maybe one day we can have a black Doctor Who'

    As he wins the outstanding newcomer prize at the Evening Standard theatre awards for his role as Othello, Lenny Henry has come a long way from black and white minstrels
  • John and Edward

    Spread of the Jedhead

    Jedward, voted off the X-Factor this weekend, are the most obvious proponents of the sticky-uppy look - but the style crosses boundaries of age, gender, sexuality and taste, says Nick Curtis

Sky in plot to hire students on the cheap

Sky News is currently recruiting students as reporters for its coverage of next year's general election. However, the opportunity doesn't quite seem so appealing

All stories


Promotions

Environmental initiatives

Find out how you can help to meet the challenges of climate change in London.


The Open University

Every year The Open University helps thousands of professionals progress in their careers.


Win the Best Seats

In London theatre when you vote for your favourite celebrity spec wearer.


Breast Cancer Care

Donate £1 and leave a message of support for a loved one in the Swarovski Garden of Wishes.


Win an iPodTouch

With Courvoisier when you share your thoughts on this week's cocktail.