News

HEADLINES:

Thirty women? That's 25 more than most of us

Nirpal Dhaliwal
02.04.08

I laughed when Lib-Dem leader Nick Clegg admitted to sleeping with "no more than 30" women. Interviewed by Piers Morgan for GQ magazine, he was initially reticent. "How many are we talking," pestered Morgan, "10? 20? 30?" All blokes lie about their sexual tallies: Clegg's ambiguous figure of "no more than 30" sounds to me very much like man-code for "four or five".

Thirty is the figure that rolled off Clegg's tongue because it's the booty-count that he thinks makes a real man. But it does seem rather high: indeed, it will have many men very worried.

Clegg isn't the first politician to induce sexual neurosis in the British public. In 2005, Tony and Cherie Blair joked that they had sex five times a night. "At least," beamed Tony. "I can do more depending on how I feel." Saying that didn't make him look capable and manly; it left me deeply disturbed. Why on earth was he telling us this? And worse, what if it were true?

But Clegg's outburst also reveals how pressured men feel - even ones as successful in their chosen profession as the Lib-Dem leader - to have had a lot of sexual partners. Much of the sex I've had was driven by an immature need to hit a target rather than any feelings for the women I was with. But like all my male friends, I privately wish I'd met the love of my life in adolescence and stuck with her.

We each recall partners we could have had a future with who were discarded just because we thought we should sleep with more people. But casual sex only proved we didn't have what we really wanted: we racked up the numbers to have something to brag about rather than admit our loneliness.

All male competition is sexual. Men don't seek wealth to impress their accountants. And men still judge each other's masculinity by their respective scores. A friend who binged on casual sex after his girlfriend left him for someone else admitted he'd felt other men were laughing at him, and had notched up the bedpost "to feel secure and able to relax".

The only good thing about having had a lot of partners is there is no unfinished business when you settle down. And while some people disapprove of women who've had a lot of men, I'd be happy to be with one. I would trust she knew what was available and had made an informed choice to be with me for the long monogamous haul.

Link to: Digg Reddit Delicious Facebook

Reader views (4)

 Add your view | Show all

Here's a sample of the latest views published. You can click view all to read all views that readers have sent in.

You've really surprised me Nirpal. I really didn't think you secretly wish you'd met the love of your life when you were younger and stuck with her. I ve read loads of stuff about you which makes me think you are the opposite of that. I don't think that way myself but I think its quite a nice surprise coming from you.

- Cathy, UK

Those who sleep with lots of people need to relax a little. Firstly, sleeping with someone you really know and like is so much more interesting and fun, secondly, what is there to gain from sleeping with so many different people? Except maybe the worry of STDs or pregnancy?
Also, Stephen, being independent doesn't automatically equate with sleeping around.

- Maggie, London

What a load of rubbish. Anyone would think sex was dirty the way you talk, Nirpal. The number of sexual partners a person has in a lifetime has more to do with circumstantial reasons, I'd say. If a person lives an independent lifestyle - whether by choice or not - they are bound to have a higher number of sexual partners than average, but that doesn't necessarily mean they are immature and wanting to score points over their peers. Having sex is natural, you know!

- Stephen, London, UK


Add your comment

Show all

 

Your email address will not be published

Terms and conditions make text area bigger You have  characters left.


 

Confidence lost on Black Friday

As uncertainty continues in the US over how far the Treasury there will follow the UK in offering equity to recapitalise major banks, it has become clear that the $700 billion Paulson plan and Federal Reserve support in money markets have not succeeded in restoring investor confidence

Turbulence for Cameron as he flies Air Freud

David Cameron's latest entry in the Register of Members' Interests shows that he has a generous new pal - Rupert Murdoch's son-in-law Matthew Freud

All stories


On This is London today

Don't miss...

  • Angel Flowers

    Hard times on the high street

    The Government has begun a massive rescue operation to prop up the crumbling pillars of the City but big institutions are not the only victims of the credit crunch. Ellen Widdup heads to Islington to see how ordinary businesses are coping
  • Bangers and mash

    Upside of the downturn

    Never mind all the gloom and doom — there are still lots of things to smile about
  • Michael Spencer

    The beginning of the end says the City’s top player

    After yesterday’s £500 billion bail out to the banks, Michael Spencer, the richest self-made man in the Square Mile talks exclusively to the Standard about who’s to blame
  • Boris Johnson

    The Influentials: London's top fifty

    Our annual survey of London’s 1000 most influential people is free with today’s Evening Standard - here we reveal the chart-toppers

City Briefing

The latest top City stories and Market report emailed to you twice a day.

Read the latest bulletin

Rosamund

Urwin Podcasts

on the City Markets



Pick of the blogs

Waugh
Paul Waugh - politics
Gordon Brown's sofa shuffle
Godwin
Richard Godwin - A London Life
The ideal day for a night out