Afternoon:
8°c
Freud's JobCentre muse
Elizabeth Hopkirk, Evening Standard11 Apr 2008
A painting of a naked JobCentre manager by Lucian Freud is expected to become the most expensive picture by a living artist ever sold when it goes under the hammer in New York next month.
The 85-year-old artist's huge canvas is predicted to make up to $35 million (£18 million) for its owner, a European collector, at a Christie's sale on 13 May.
The auction house is putting the 1m x 2m picture on show at its King Street offices today, Monday and Tuesday, the first time it has been seen in public in Britain.
Today, the woman in the picture, 51-year-old Sue Tilley, who works in a West End JobCentre, told how it was almost never painted.
The first time the artist met her, in a Soho nightclub 20 years ago, he criticised her lipstick. "He said it had too many blue tones. The next time we met was over lunch at the River Café and I wore a different lipstick," she said.
She knew she was effectively being interviewed for the role of artist's muse and was briefed on how to behave by their mutual friend, performance artist Leigh Bowery.
"But I just did as I wanted as usual," said Ms Tilley, who grew up in Sussex Gardens and now lives in Mornington Crescent.
"Soon after, Leigh called me up and said, 'Lucian wants you to start work next week' and he made me practise stripping off on my settee at home before I went to Lucian's house in Holland Park. I like a bit of excitement but I was still mortified when I got there and he told me to take my clothes off. For the first picture I had to lie on the floorboards in a most uncomfortable position with Leigh and Nicola, the woman he married, and a dog.
"I was in agony and I thought about giving up. But we work hard in my family so I stuck it for the whole nine months. Leigh got rubbed out because he went to Scotland and Lucian needs you to be devoted. He won't work on the painting when you're not there." Ms Tilley, who has worked at the JobCentre in Denmark Street for 30 years and previously worked in nightclubs, modelled for Freud on her days off. "For the picture on the sofa I only had three days off in two years. Every weekend he expected me to be there and I couldn't go on holiday because I couldn't get a tan," she said.
"It was wonderful to spend time with such a fantastic person and see him working. Lucian has an opinion on everything and he was interested in my run-of-the-mill life."
Three years ago she sold an etching of herself she was given by Freud, whom she has lost touch with, for £26,000.
But she was astonished by the estimate Benefits Supervisor Sleeping, 1995, has attracted.
"I'm beside myself. Wait till I tell my mum," she said. "If I had the money I'd buy it myself because it's my favourite."
She added: "I might go to the exhibition. I'm sure no one would recognise me."
Reader views (8)
I know very little about painting but to the idiots who are reacting to this painting in terms of how sexually attractive is the sitter, I would ask that you perhaps try some soft porn.
- lucian, mayfair, england, 10/07/2010 23:54
Report abuse
Freud is undoubtedly a significant painter. He doesn't arouse my own great enthusiasm like Francis Bacon does, but his stuff is certainly worth seeing (unlike anything I've ever seen in the BP Portrait competition).
My only complaint is that he seems to do the same thing time after time.
- James Thomson, London, UK, 22/07/2008 13:15
Report abuse
I don't like this painting. I don't think I would like it hanging on my wall to be honest but having said that I am glad old skill is back to the market. Can't stand Tracy Emin's work. She is a vulgar to me. At least Lucian Freud shows us some brush work.
- Amelia Poon, Cambridge, 26/06/2008 22:01
Report abuse
It's an excellent painting. The woman and the couch seem as one. It is evidently far superior to any competent amateur's evening class painting.
I don't think any painting is worth millions. I don't care if some rich nappyhead spends one thousand pounds or fifty million on it. It does not change it's intrinsic artistic value.
- William, Scotland, 12/05/2008 23:51
Report abuse
I think it's a beautiful painting!
- Nina, Surrey, 02/05/2008 16:37
Report abuse
This is our most valued artist? Most over-valued, I would say. It is an ugly painting of an obese woman. Despite its value (?) I could not look at it for more than a few moments, as I am not interested in studying every roll of fat.
I do not think it is well-painted, too much white, too pasty, and not much life in it at all. I would call it a competent amateur's evening life-class painting.
The light is particularly bad.
You can fool some of the critics some of the time, but not all the critics (and public) all the time, Mr. Freud.
Brian Sewell, where are you when we need you?
I say the Emperor has no clothes.
- Sidney Marks, Brighton, England, 17/04/2008 22:02
Report abuse
It's magnificent... We must buy it for the Country.
- Paul, Bromley, 11/04/2008 16:58
Report abuse
Why would anyone want to buy this is beyond me. It is a truely repulsive image.
- Simon, Harrow, UK, 11/04/2008 14:12
Report abuse
