Weather Afternoon: 14°c Light showers Tonight: 9°c Light showers

News

HEADLINES:

Comment: the real cost of the 2012 Games

Evening Standard
22.04.08

The Commons Public Accounts Committee's report on the spiralling cost of the London Olympics makes painful reading for Tessa Jowell, the minister responsible. The committee's chairman, Edward Leigh, damns the original estimate of just over £4 billion as "entirely unrealistic". The bigger worry for the future, though, is the impact of the increased costs on the Games' legacy.

At the time of the bid, the figure given for the core cost to the public purse was roughly £2.3 billion, or £4 billion including infrastructure costs and private sector contributions, calculated on the basis set out by the International Olympic Committee. However, the gap between that and more realistic estimates continues to raise questions over ministers' candour.

By March 2007, Ms Jowell had revised the figure to £9.3 billion. As today's report points out, most of the costs included in the increased estimate were entirely foreseeable, such as security, the need to pay VAT and the effect of inflation. As for the private sector money that was assumed for the original bid - £738 million - by March 2007 it had been revised downwards to £168 million. The Committee says it will hold the Department for Culture, Media and Sport to account for its promise not to exceed its revised estimate of £9.3 billion. But how? Even since Ms Jowell made that promise, the likely cost of the velodrome has doubled from £40 million to £80 million; the price of the aquatics centre has tripled to £242 million; and the cost of the Olympics village has more than doubled to £500 million.

Higher costs raise the stakes for the Games' legacy. They also threaten it, for as the cost of venues rises, the temptation may well be to concentrate on completing them at the expense of the Games' effects on both regeneration and grassroots sport. Today's report criticises Whitehall for the lack of legacy planning: these huge cost increases make it more important than ever that ministers now set clear goals and appoint a single figure with the clout to make sure that we get the long-term benefits of the Games that London was originally promised.

Reader views (1)

 Add your view

This disgraceful waste of public funds should be halted right now, and those responsible for the criminal lack of financial rigour sacked and prosecuted. The morons jumping for joy when the announcement was made three years ago were obviously never going to be the ones expected to foot the bill.

- The Gene Genie, Croydon


Add your comment

 

Your email address will not be published

Terms and conditions make text area bigger You have  characters left.


 

Don't Miss
  • Lenny Henry

    Lenny Henry: 'Maybe one day we can have a black Doctor Who'

    Shortlisted at today's Evening Standard theatre awards for his role as Othello, Lenny Henry has come a long way from black and white minstrels
  • John and Edward

    Spread of the Jedhead

    Jedward, voted off the X-Factor this weekend, are the most obvious proponents of the sticky-uppy look - but the style crosses boundaries of age, gender, sexuality and taste, says Nick Curtis

Sky in plot to hire students on the cheap

Sky News is currently recruiting students as reporters for its coverage of next year's general election. However, the opportunity doesn't quite seem so appealing

All stories


Promotions

Environmental initiatives

Find out how you can help to meet the challenges of climate change in London.


The Open University

Every year The Open University helps thousands of professionals progress in their careers.


Win the Best Seats

In London theatre when you vote for your favourite celebrity spec wearer.


Breast Cancer Care

Donate £1 and leave a message of support for a loved one in the Swarovski Garden of Wishes.


Win an iPodTouch

With Courvoisier when you share your thoughts on this week's cocktail.