Morning:
13°c
Battersea's £4bn glass tower to dwarf the Wharf
Jonathan Prynn, Consumer Affairs Editor23.06.08
A £4 billion masterplan to save Battersea Power Station before it collapses was unveiled today.
The project includes a 1,000ft-high glass tower - taller than Canary Wharf - next to the instantly recognisable brick landmark. There will be more than 3,000 homes, shopping malls, a boutique hotel and a "green" office quarter.
The plans also call for a new spur off the Northern Line to link the power station site to the Underground network.
The Irish developers, the third owners of the power station since it was decommissioned in 1983, describe the scheme as "the most exciting real estate proposal ever to come forward in Britain."
Its most radical element is the transparent canopy over the office development officially known as the Ecodome, but already dubbed "The Funnel".
The Funnel, the brainchild of Uruguayan architect Rafael Vinoly, will be topped with a huge glass chimney and will provide its own "natural" air conditioning to the development, hugely reducing its electricity needs.
Developer Treasury Holdings UK says it is essential to make the whole project carbon neutral. If it gets the go ahead, the Funnel will be higher than any structure now standing in London when it is completed in 2019.
It will tower above the 771ft One Canada Square at Canary Wharf. The developers insist that the transparent dome, to be made of a similar material to that covering the Eden Project in Cornwall, is not a building but a "solar driven natural ventilation system," the biggest of its kind in the world. It will cover a 2.5 million square foot office development which will have only a third of the energy needs of conventional offices.
The sun will heat the air under the Dome, causing it to rise up the tower, known as the chimney. That will in turn suck in air from outside the glass canopy, which will will stop at thirdstorey level, creating a constant breeze that will cool the offices.
The chimney will surround apartments up to 240 metres but the top 60 metres will be an empty glass tube. The absence of electricity-hungry air conditioning will help the developers achieve their target of carbon neutrality, making the project hugely attractive to "progressive" tenants such as Google and Apple that the developers hope to attract. Rob Tincknell, managing director of Treasury Holdings UK, said: "This is not a token gesture, it will make a serious dent in the level of emissions.
"The annual carbon reduction is 80,000 tonnes of CO2 a year, the same as a town the size of Newbury."
On either side of the power station will be three large apartment blocks, built "no higher" than the base of the chimneys. In total there will be 3,200 homes on the site, a huge advance on the 750 proposed by previous owners Parkview. Today's proposal is the latest in a long succession of plans to find a use for the 83-year-old p ower stat i on. All have foundered because of spiralling costs and the fast deteriorating state of the building.
The latest project is likely to be the last chance to save the world famous "cathedral of industry" with its four white chimneys towering over the Thames. It has stood abandoned for 25 years and is in desperate need of repair work. The chimneys, which are suffering from concrete rot, will have to be pulled down and replaced by replicas.
The restored power station will be at the centre of a 38-acre site with eight million square feet of shops, apartment, cafes, offices and a hotel.
The developers want to create three floors of shopping with many independent stores "to give it the feel of a Covent Garden or a Neal's Yard." and a two-storey hotel.
Mr Tincknell said: "This will be Britain's first truly verifiable carbon neutral major development.
"If people begin to see the credibility of the scheme and see the benefits of it, I think people will support it."
The power station was bought by Irish property tycoons Johnny Ronan and Richard Barrett, who control Treasury Holdings, for £400 million last year.
Reader views (6)
Well, what a mighty great building!
I'm really not convinced this is what Battersea Power Station needs. It already has four huge towers, and I think another is just overkill.
When will we learn??
- Will Manfield, London, Battersea
You have got to be joking, it is the most ridiculous inappropriate creation, how is this getting through, it does not fit in with the surrounding land or sky scape in this predominately residential area. This project clearly is lacking sympathy for the history or setting of the area. Surely these modernistic towers should be to the East of London... Has reality not shown us that these carbon neutral buildings are not working examples here are City Hall and Albion Wharf where the heating and ventilation systems have failed to produce.
- Nicola Nardelli, Battersea
Looks good to me. The present site - even with the iconic building - is an eyesore and has been for the past 25 years. The fact is that buildings like Battersea are no longer economic except when they form part of a massive development. Unless, of course, that those "progressive" left leaning urban conservationist types are happy to convince the community that millions and millions of public money that should be spent on schools and hospitals would instead be better spent restoring an old derelict coal burying power station.
- Jeff Bronstein, Hobart, Australia
This is a landmark of London, that should be preserved, before it is lost to us forever. What a waste it has stood empty and decaying and something should be done to preserve and renovate it before it is too late. Surely some one has got the gumption too put it too good use,what about all of the rich people who have got so much money and they don't know what to do with it? Their money I mean, it needs to be looked after for prosperity.
- Maggie Payne, London U K
Here we go again! Yet another plan to save the Power Station is released, but will it actually go ahead? Well bare in mind that the Power Station closed 25 years ago and the land has yet to be used for something more productive other than a film set or a circus then this is probably doubtful that this will go any further than the plans like every other idea so far. Every 5 - 6 years someone comes up with a 'masterplan' to recreate this iconic building. I think it is one of the best buildings in London, but also one of the saddest as well as it has had its guts ripped out and is now effectively orphaned again, as every idea that is raised never comes to anything. Someone said on the bus the other day as we went past that they should just pull it down and build flats on the land as the restoration will cost far too much to do. Trouble is I'm beginning to agree with them as to have a building of this stature slowly rot away is wrong, totally wrong.
- Tim, London, England
What an excellent project if it gets the go ahead.
- Mikko Takala, Drumnadrochit, Scotland
