Weather Afternoon: 10°c Sunny spells Tonight: 4°c Partly Cloudy Night

News

Harriet Harman
Women's minister Harriet Harman has highlighted unequal pay for women

City firms must reveal pay rates in war on 42% gender gap

Paul Waugh, Deputy Political Editor
27 Jun 2008


Ministers declared war on " sexism in the City" today as research showed men in the financial sector are paid an average of 42 per cent more than their female colleagues.

London's financial industry will be forced to expose the gender pay gap as part of sweeping changes included in a new equality Bill.

Under the plans unveiled by women's minister Harriet Harman:

• Firms will no longer be allowed to impose "gagging clauses" preventing employees revealing their salaries.

• All companies given public sector contracts will have to publish the pay rates of men and women.

• The City will face a full-scale investigation into sexist differences in pay rates by the Equality and Human Rights Commission.

• Square Mile and Canary Wharf firms will have to voluntarily publish total bonuses for the two sexes - or face new Companies Act powers to compel them to do so.

The Bill, due in the autumn, is seen by Gordon Brown as a valuable part of his two-year fightback against the Tories. By including new rights for the elderly to fair NHS treatment with the commitment to women, it is seen as key to persuading voters the Prime Minister is prepared to be radical.

The Bill will let employers discriminate in favour of ethnic minorities when two job candidates are of equal ability. It replaces nine major pieces of legislation and around 100 other measures, from the 1970 Equal Pay Act to the 2005 Disability Discrimination Act.

Research published today shows women in financial services are paid 41.5 per cent less than men on average. The national gender pay gap is 12.6 per cent. Unequal pay has been illegal for more than 30 years but in London men earn on average 24 per cent more than women.

Ms Harman told the Standard it was "time to end the British culture of not wanting to talk about pay". She said the financial services industry was one of the worst offenders, adding: "Pay isn't a private issue any longer, it's a social justice issue and a public policy issue."

She told MPs today: "Just as every school has to publish their exam result so parents can see, and every hospital has to publish its waiting lists so patients can see, I want employers to report on key equality matters like gender pay."

Tory MP Graham Brady asked whether it would be legal for a firm to discriminate against an equally qualified black man in favour of a white woman. Ms Harman refused to answer. Business groups said they were "very strongly against" compulsory pay audits. Katja Hall, of the CBI, said: "They are very expensive and very time-consuming. Pay gaps are not the result of discrimination - they are because many women would prefer to work in the HR department than the finance department, or that they prefer part-time work."

Reader views (3)

 Add your view

The key here is "tie-break" which implies that all the qualifications and ability criteria have been met equally by all the relevant candidates, if this happens then the employer can choose to do a little bit of positive discrimination.
The fact that such encouragement has to come from the government implies that if there is a situation where there are two candidates of equal worth but are of different ethnicities or sex then it will still remain business as normal.

- Pat Sullivan, United Kingdom, 01/07/2008 02:06
Report abuse

Disgraceful. Any legislation that discriminates against white men. I'm never voting Labour again.

- John, Manchester, 26/06/2008 22:38
Report abuse

Many of the things in this new Bill are good, but one area is not.

The Bill states that if two candidates for a job are 'equally qualified', then a business has the right to choose the ethnic minority or female candidate purely on the basis of ethnicity or gender.
This does not apply to white candidates or male candidates.

This is ridiculous- there will never be two candidates with exactly the same qualifications and abilities.
If a 'tie-breaker' is required between two candidates, it should be ability-based, not gender or ethnicity based.

Positive discrimination is a contradiction in terms.

- Robert Cunningham, Harrow, London, UK, 26/06/2008 12:26
Report abuse


Add your comment

 

Terms and conditions Make text area bigger You have  characters left.

We welcome your opinions. This is a public forum. Libellous and abusive comments are not allowed. Please read our House Rules.

For information about privacy and cookies please read our Privacy Policy.


 

 

  • Riot axeman terror at McDonald's Axe man A rioter who terrorised diners with an axe at McDonald's has been jailed for five years and three months - one of the toughest sentences for...
  • Terror of boy exposed as gang witness Scotland Yard A BOY and his family had to flee their London home after a blunder by the Met and Crown Prosecution Service gave his name to gang members he...
  • Mayor of poverty-hit council hires adviser in £1,000-a-day deal Lutfur Rahman One of the poorest boroughs in London is under fire for spending £1,000 a day on a personal aide for its mayor
  • Hyde Park mega-concerts at risk after neighbours complain about the noise Hyde park crowd Major music concerts in Hyde Park could be axed because Westminster council believes they are too noisy
  • Soho 'field hospital' for drunks reopens David Cameron smile A field hospital set up to deal with London's drunks is being extended as the binge-drinking crisis deepens in the capital
  • Jobless total jumps by 48,000 with UK facing 'zig-zag year' Job Centre unemployment Bank of England Governor Sir Mervyn King warned Britain faces a "zig-zag" year of growth and gloom today as unemployment rose by 48,000
  • Greens and Ukip could test Paddick in fight for mayor poll third place Paddick Brian Paddick could struggle even to finish third in this year's mayoral election, as smaller parties look set to capitalise on Lib-Dem woes...
  • Phone-hack private eye can appeal over human rights ruling Glenn Mulcaire The private investigator at the centre of the phone hacking scandal was today granted the right by the Supreme Court to appeal against a...
  • Britain's athletes could be banned from 2012 for criticising the team Olympic site British athletes risk being banned from the Olympics if they criticise team-mates or sponsors under rules that cover tattoos, contact lenses...
  • Make 'death trap' junctions safer for cyclists, demands university mourning three Ellie Carey A university that saw two students and a member of staff killed cycling in London last year has accused Boris Johnson of failing to act...
  •  

    Don't Miss
    • London Gateway

      Supersize superport: London Gateway

      London Gateway, the £1.5bn container port under construction on the Thames at Thurrock, will have capacity to unload six of the world's largest ships at one time and have as much impact on the capital as a new airport or half a dozen Westfield shopping centres
    • Matthew Williamson

      One stylish affair: Matthew Williamson

      With London Fashion Week kicking off on Friday, British designer Matthew Williamson tells Rosamund Urwin about breaking up with his ex, post-show partying and his new model man