Afternoon:
11°c
Looking back at last week, it's hard to say what was the more depressing: the no fewer than six people fatally stabbed in London, one of them the year's 18th teenager to die by the knife; or the enforced departure of the man who might have done something about it.
Of course Ray Lewis, the deputy mayor for young people, had to go. And let there be no doubt: this is a bad blow for Boris. After a whole election campaign, plus weeks of post-election whingeing, in which his enemies entirely missed the point about him, the Mayor has now kindly given them a big illuminated sign towards what was always his real area of weakness: detail and grip.
It will now be open season on all Boris's other appointees. Let us hope that none of them has ever had a parking ticket. A hole has been blown in the Mayor's crime policy, his most critical area.
The orgy of gloating on the Left may, however, be premature. The Westminster village is giving Lewis, and Boris, a kicking. But if the immediate reaction from radio phone-ins is any guide at all, there could be a backlash in voter-land. Ordinary Londoners may see Lewis as a man trying to save young lives, brought down by petty enmities and long-ago mistakes.
That view may not survive if further and more serious particulars surface about Lewis. It's certainly possible they could. But three days' papers have been and gone; and so far we've heard nothing of any supposed sexual misbehaviour or child abuse. So far, Lewis has not been accused of anything specific that should necessarily have disqualified him from his job - if only he had been open about it.
It's bad that Lewis does appear to have, shall we say, abuse of trust issues from the mid-1990s. But some of the most effective workers with tough kids have far worse pasts than that. The fact that Lewis comes from the same chequered background as the knife-carriers is why he can reach them in a way that middle-class social workers cannot.
We must not close public life to the mavericks, the rough diamonds, to anyone who has ever done anything unsafe. As Hazel Blears pipes her glee at the Tories' "disarray," she usefully reminds us about the risk of a City Hall entirely staffed by 10,000 copies of Hazel Blears. Ray Lewis rightly challenged the failure of the state; the forces of state failure were never going to take kindly to that.
Yet for a crusader, Lewis left himself absurdly open to attack. In politics, the kind of CV-embellishment you can get away with as a voluntary worker just won't do. It was utterly stupid to face the cameras and bluff. Did he imagine journalists would not check what he said?
Lewis might still be in place had City Hall found out about his past, pre-emptively made it public and perhaps given him a more armslength job. He, Boris, and the knife victims of London were let down by grossly inadequate staff work that failed to probe, failed to make Lewis understand the new world he was in and, worst of all, allowed Johnson to defend his deputy at a press conference without forensically examining his story to make sure it was true.
Is there any silver lining? Well, I know Lee Jasper, and Ray Lewis is no Lee Jasper. No public money is missing. No wrongdoing happened on the Mayor's watch. Unlike Ken, Boris acted quickly to lance the boil. Boris's mistake was a willingness to believe, not a willingness to deceive; his administration is still young enough to have public goodwill. Labour can usually be relied on to trump any Tory disarray with disarray-cubed of its own. And the very urgency of the knife crime problem puts all the politics into perspective.
As schools start issuing teachers with stabproof vests, Boris needs to get back to the story Londoners really care about, the blood on our streets. That, rather than this " scandal", is how he will be judged. And after rather more homework this time, he needs another policy, or person, who can recover that lost Ray of hope.
Reader views (8)
Look everyone Livingstone's lovies out in force here. When Boris hires a series of individuals who may very well have stolen millions of our money then I will worry. Funny the only scalp you bitter little people on the empty left can claim is a black ex-anglican priest who was actually doing good - you must all be so proud. The very idea of a black person not blindly following the victim mantras of the left and actually doing something proactive and positive must really stick in your throats
- Christian Ball, London, UK
Want an example of even-handed, unbiased journalism which keeps the mayor in check? Look elsewhere.
- Charles Marino, Walthamstow
Andrew, I thought you said you were going to be even handed with your investigative journalism if Mr Johnson was elected. If this report is an example then heaven help us. Bring back John Wilkes.
- David Wood, Macclesfield
Interesting perspective from the insidious Gilligan, that stealing from vulnerable adults is Ok provided your a tory...
How long with the donut brigade stick with a mayor who has already substantiated many peoples worst fears, that he is incapable of basic governance competences such as hiring people who aren't ex-cons or racists.
Two down after only a couple of months..
- Nick Griggs, Edmonton
Gilligan: "Ordinary Londoners may see Lewis as a man... brought down by petty enmities and long-ago mistakes."
Long-ago mistakes? Petty? Unbelievable. So it's a valid excuse to have done something seriously wrong provided it was "in the past." And how, exactly, is this 'petty'?
Gilligan: "Well, I know Lee Jasper, and Ray Lewis is no Lee Jasper. No public money is missing"
Oh, so it's ok to steal money from individuals who trust you as long as it doesn't hit the average taxpayer.
Gilligan: "Boris needs to get back to the story Londoners really care about"
Yes - who cares. No big deal is it. Bit of lying, incompetence, etc. No harm in that...
Plus - why have you written "scandal" in inverted commas. It is a scandal. By implication this suggests you are think it is not.
- Kieran, London, UK
I think the big question is that what is more important to Hazel Blears and her colleagues, trying to stop more deaths happening or scoring cheap points?
Quite clearly it's the latter, which really does in my opinion bring into question their fitness to hold a position in government.
- Alex, London
My, my,my. I know according to Andy Lewis is no Lee Jasper, but really, is this really subjective, independent journalism that led Andy to this conclusion, or is it moreover the fact the Lewis is a Tory, as is Mr Andrew "Tory attack dog on former Labour London mayoralty with at least one feature a week in the run up to the election" Gilligan. Funny how the worm turns and moral ambiguity arises when it's one of your own!
- Dave, London
Would you rather Mr Lewis remained in office, even if the allegations are true?
From the Standard, we read that Boris Johnson sought legal advice in an attempt to prevent publication of these allegations.
So much for transparency if this is true.
By what name are the low-life known who persisted in making false accusations against Mr Jasper? Still no charges, still no arrest.
From the tone of your comments, it appears to be ok if the Tories attempt to cover up what should legitimately be in the public domain.
Most right minded people still think we live in a democracy, and we are not at war with the opposition. I find it is usually people of your ilk, who think those who do not agree with them should be crushed.
Boris's "Forensic Audit" will probably find no dirt as the most dodgy grant it could investigate is the £50,000 given to Price Waterhouse Cooper, outside any proper procurement process, when one of the four members of the Audit Panel is a senior manager at PWC.
I don't think they will find a single example in Ken's eight years of such a corrupt piece of grant giving.
- Dr Susan Porter, London
