My state school can save parents £250,000 in fees
David Cohen28.10.08
The drawing of a circle on a map displayed on the wall of headteacher Aydin Onac's office looks anodyne enough but it's what most prospective house-buyers in Muswell Hill are desperate to see. Described from a central compass point that bisects Onac's office, the circle demarcates the precise catchment area of Fortismere calculated to three decimal places. If you buy within its 0.598-mile radius, your children are assured places at Fortismere, one of the top five comprehensives in London, as well as at neighbouring Tetherdown, one of the best 15 primaries in England. But you'll pay up to a 20 per cent premium or £400,000 hard cash for the privilege.
Known as "The Fortismere Factor", it means that a £1.8 million house outside the circle suddenly jumps to £2.2 million when it falls within it, say local estate agents. And although the credit crunch has meant overall prices have fallen by 20 per cent in the past year, the differential remains. Madness, you might say. But actually, insists Onac, it is rooted in sound economics.
"Middle-class parents have calculated that by moving into our catchment area they are getting the equivalent of a private education for nothing. I estimate that a family with two children will save £250,000 in private school fees by sending them to us and Tetherdown, and a family of four £500,000."
School catchment areas and the annual battle by parents to place their children in the school of their choice are becoming more and more divisive as the recession forces increasing numbers of cost-cutting middle-class families to opt out of private education in favour of the best state schools.
Last Friday, on the deadline for September 2009 secondary school admissions, the Evening Standard revealed that one third of families have been rejected by their top-rated school this year. In some boroughs, barely half of children received an offer from their first-choice secondary, while almost 6,000 failed to secure a place at any of their six preferred options.
Onac says: "My heart goes out to those parents and children who have their hearts set on a certain school and who will be bitterly disappointed. The situation families face here at Fortismere is even more competitive as we are one of the 100 most oversubscribed schools in the country.
"I am anticipating that we will have had in excess of 1,200 applications for 243 places, which means that 80 per cent of families who apply will be denied a place. The local authority doesn't tell us how many of the 1,200 who apply put Fortismere as their first choice, but with our outstanding results you can make your own conclusions."
Does Onac think that Haringey Education Authority should follow the radical lead of Ealing, which is talking about doing away with catchment areas entirely? "I am aware of various initiatives by different councils, and although at the moment our school governors are not pursuing that route, we are considering a change to our admissions criteria," he admits.
"I've got to choose my words carefully here because selecting on the basis of ability is against the rules for a comprehensive, but the admissions code allows us to admit up to 10 per cent of the Year Seven intake based on their aptitude in the school's key specialist subject areas in our case music and languages and we are currently considering that.
"It would be good if some families who live beyond the 0.598-mile radius had a chance of getting their children into Fortismere without having to become millionaires."
Onac welcomes the "long-overdue" Government decision to scrap Sats tests for 14-year-olds. "You don't fatten the pig by constantly weighing it," he says, believing GCSE and A-level results are what schools should be judged on.
"Last year almost half of our 180 GCSE student-cohort got A*s or As, up from 25 per cent, and almost 60 per cent of our A-level students got A or B grades, the best ever results for Fortismere," he says. "We also had eight students confirm their places at Oxford, Cambridge or medical school, up from just one student the year before."
How do these results compare to the top private schools? "Recently I did a little exercise," Onac says. "I looked at how many students the average private school enters for GCSEs, which was around 100, and I compared them with our top 100 and you know what we knocked spots off most independent and selective schools in Greater London. We were the equal of UCS [University College School] and Highgate School and only a whisker away from Henrietta Barnett, one of the most selective schools in the country."
It is results like these that have put Fortismere on the map. Such is the clamour that some local estate agents are known to keep flats within the catchment which they rent at inflated prices to families seeking to "fiddle the system" by taking out short-term lets during the selection period. Mark Ellis, manager of local estate agent Prickett & Ellis, says: "I often spend more time speaking to prospective buyers about schools than the property they are there to buy."
But despite the rise of Fortismere up the league tables, Onac, who took over the headship two-and-a-half years ago, has proved a controversial appointment. This is because Haringey council, the National Union of Teachers and a vociferous minority group of parents believe his unashamed pursuit of results is to the detriment of the catchment's less academic children. So vehement were they in opposing his vision that he came close, he says, to resigning his £110,000-a-year headship on several occasions.
"When I joined in April 2006, I inherited a school held back by an egalitarian mindset that was stuck in the Seventies," says Onac, 55, who is of mixed English and Turkish descent and lives with his partner, also a teacher, in Hampstead. "I had no idea how deep-set it was, or that I faced the battle of my life to let people know just who was in charge.
"There were moments I thought about whether I really wanted the aggravation, especially when I was approached by headhunters to join other schools on a salary of £140,000. I decided to stay because I'm not a quitter, because I believed I had the support of the silent majority of parents, and because I thought my vision was in the best interests of the children."
Instead, Onac took on the NUT, Haringey council and the disgruntled parents all at once. It came to a head with his battle last year to pursue foundation status, which would take Fortismere out of council control and give the governors power over the school's land, admissions criteria and teachers' salaries.
But a high-profile group of parents which included theatre director David Thacker and Guardian writer Simon Hattenstone set up in opposition. They started a website called Keep Fortismere Comprehensive and held numerous public meetings where they condemned Onac and called for him to be "immediately sacked".
At stake was the soul of a comprehensive regarded as the jewel in the crown in Haringey. More than 70 per cent of Fortismere pupils its most notable alumnus is former X Files actress Gillian Anderson consistently achieved five A*-C grade GCSEs (including English and maths) under previous headteacher Andrew Nixon, who had been there for 23 years. When Onac was headhunted from a state school in Gloucestershire to take over at Fortismere, he was expected to continue in the same vein as his predecessor, valuing inclusiveness and egalitarianism above excellence.
But Onac never read the script. Perhaps they should have seen the signs for Onac thrives on challenge. Before he took a maths degree at University College London and fell into teaching by accident, he was a concert pianist from the Royal College of Music who performed Rachmaninov with the Royal Philharmonic Orchestra at the Royal Albert Hall. The child of an immigrant father, a metallurgist working for British Steel near Sheffield, he had grown up on a tough council estate where the neighbours were factory workers and where he was the only one in his entire school to pass the old 11-plus exam. "I learned that the only way to get ahead in life was to be top," he says.
"My first thought on coming to Fortismere," he adds, "was that given that most families here are wealthy or middle-class (only seven per cent on free school meals), our academic performance was mediocre. Often students had a lackadaisical attitude. This extended to sixth formers who said: 'We're a state school, we can't think of Oxbridge.'
"I arranged for the students to visit Oxford colleges by the busload and this year we got 10 students into Oxbridge and medical school, and half the cohort into Russell Group universities."
But to lift aspirations, Onac had to change the ethos. He began by scrapping mixed-ability classrooms and "setting" the pupils by ability for all subjects. It provoked an uproar from parents who complained that poorly performing children were being "removed and separated" almost like ethnic cleansing and that it compromised "equal opportunities".
Onac counters: "I'm all for equal opportunity, but equal opportunity means realising each child is different and challenging them at their level, not lumping them in one class."
He also set about tackling "lax behaviour" and "lack of respect" the product, he says baldly, of "arrogance bred out of affluence". "Children would put their feet on the desks, talk over teachers and had a sense of entitlement that they owned the classroom. That has changed completely. Now I walk round the school and I see classrooms where it's absolutely clear who is in charge."
But even though Onac won foundation status last year, giving him more control, he is frustrated that the Government does not fund schools directly, as they do academies. "The Government gives £10 million to our school but we only see £9 million of it because the council creams off £1 million for itself. What they do for this money " he rolls his eyes " I don't know, but they seem to employ a lot of consultants. If the Government is saying direct funding of academies is the best way to kickstart a new generation of schools, why not apply this across the board? My message to Gordon Brown is plain: give us the money, we'll deliver the quality.
"Also," he says, "the message from the Government and the LEA is that the worse you are, the more we'll fund you. How can that be right?" He cites a recent £165 million government grant to Haringey schools part of the Building Schools for the Future government initiative as a case in point. "If that money had been split equally between all secondary schools in Haringey, Fortismere would have got £16 million for new buildings, but we only got £4 million because we're not in a deprived area."
In his determination to take Fortismere from "very good" to "excellent", there is nothing he will not contemplate changing, he says. "Except for one thing," he smiles, pointing to pupils dressed in faded jeans and T-shirts. "Some people thought that because I'm a disciplinarian, I'd introduce a school uniform. But the word 'uniform' means 'the same', and I don't want our children to be the same. I don't even care if they wear hoodies. As long as they get what I'm about: that only their best will suffice, and that it's cool to be clever."
Reader views (11)
Egalitarian? He says it like its a bad thing. Results when Nixon was here are just as good as Onacs, he needs to sort his priorities. Having a school whos results look good in paper arent worth it when students, teachers, and parents are ignored. That man is not worth £40,000.
- Angry Students, Forismere
I have reciently moved into the catchment area in order to get my children into Fortismere and I consider myself to be one of the "silent majority" the Head refers to. I'm concerned about the apparant level of bitterness directed towards the headmaster.
The main complaint people seem to have is that the Heads attempt to improve standards has somehow left their childen behind. If you don't agree that a schools primary function is about education to the highest standard possible for each child then perhaps you should consider moving your children to a school whos focus is closer to your expectations.
I only hope all these attacks don't actually make him dissolusioned and leave, for then whatever side of the fence your on, I'm sure you would agree such instabillity would be a disaster.
- New Fortismere Parent, Muswell Hill,England
I want to correct a statement in David Cohen's article. As somone who attended all the Keep Fortismere Comprehensive meetings, at no stage were there calls for the Headteacher to be 'immediately sacked'. Those present were concerned to keep the local school comprehensive.
I know of a parent of a 14 year old boy who has just been graded in his subjects. Because his maths results were C, he has been streamed into a certain class. This means he will automatically not meet the selection criteria to go on in to the 6th form. So, at 14, he knows he is not good enough. This is not comprehensive education.
- Laura Butterfield, London UK
We live in the Fortismere cathchement area, not because we are millionaires but because we moved here over 20 years ago when no-one had heard of Muswell Hill and property prices were much lower. Mr Onac's description of arrogance bred by affluence is an unhelpful soundbite, and a massive distortion. We are not saying that the school was perfect before he arrived - it always seemed a bit casual - but we have observed the way in which the school under Onac's leadership has been transformed from a very happy, stable and inclusive environment to one in which only the achievements of a master-race of very bright, compliant children are celebrated, at the expense of those who are less academic whom Mr Onac clearly looks on as an underclass. We are not the only local family who thinks this is regrettable. We wish he'd accept one of the jobs he claims he's been offered!
- A Fortismere Parent, Muswell Hill, London, UK
As the parent of a highly intelligent Fortismere child with a special need, I have to be constantly vigilant to make sure my son gets the classroom support to which he is legally entitled by his statement of special needs, and which he needs to help him achieve his high academic potential. I am aware that since Aydin Onac arrived at the school, many other children with special needs at Fortismere have not received the support specified in their legally bindin statements. The once excellent Learning Support department has been decimated. I chose Fortismere because it was avowedly both 'academically strong and inclusive'. Now it is just academic. I feel I have been cheated out of what the school promised me.
- Veronica Zundel, London, UK
I don't see what's wrong with Onac's approach. Surely none of us wants our children held back by being mixed in with slower, disruptive students. Children who simply aren't bright enough to get good A levels are better off finding something else to do elsewhere after GCSE, rather than staying on with their friends and failing to keep up. Other schools would do well to follow his example.
- I Wronack, London UK
I completely agree with all of the points raised, by 'parent, London' in particular. It's such a shame diversity isn't welcomed anymore! I want the Christmas concerts to be enjoyable again. Also, why Onac fails to tell people, in any of his speeches, about the good special needs department and all of the support provided, I don't know, because I'm sure it would make the school even more appealing. He doesn't seem to think that these members of staff are as important as others. He talks about how much he supposedly likes the individuality of students and their different acheivements, so then why does he only focus his attentions on the A and A* students, when other students are getting grades that are amazing for those particular students! They're not A's, so they're not important to him. ARGH!
- Student At Fortismere, London
If you check the facts you'll see that Mr Onac has not significantly improved results at Fortismere since he arrived. Other Haringey schools are catching up fast and, if you take value added into account, are actually doing far better by their pupils. He has always wanted to run an elitist, independent, selective school and, looking at his plateauing results, he's not succeeding. His interview with the Standard sounds a bit desperate. The governors paid him £40k as a golden hello, too. What a terrible waste of public money.
- J Davies, London
Yes, this headmaster can make statistics say anything he wants. All we hear about as parents is of the youngsters who go to Oxbridge but what about value added,what about children with special needs? It is very clear at the school that Mr Onac only values academic success. It is not a minority of parents who are very concerned about their children welfare at the school, it is a large group of parents that now have no voice at all since the school became a Foundation school. The constant pressure and testing, the changing into different groups, the dropping of registration time, the lack of pastoral concern, the erosion of the friendly, inclusive approach that celebrated diversity and individuality, this is not something many parents welcome actually. As one of my children said "it's not suprising that British children have the highest level of mental health problems in Europe if they go to a schoool like this." Fortismere was reknowned for its amazing Christmas concert where wonderfully talented young peoples' displayed their passion and musicianship and their support and respect for each other regardless of style, electric or acoustic. Mr Onac instead has tried to do away with it in its present form and is demanding that the prime emphasis is classical, we were obviously having too much fun. I pity the child who is not academically able, and I pity some of the wonderful teachers. This is education at its most blinkered. Marks marks marks alone.
- Parent, London
What a terrible shame that only rich families can buy properties in the neighbouring streets and send their kids to that school.
- Keith Price, Luton, England
I actually object to the comments of the headmaster. What the parents are getting is a very good education and certainly not a state education equivalent to a private one. There are many state schools that are far better than a huge number of private schools. To equate state schools that have no choice over their catchment area with selective private schools is a nonsense anyway. I sincerely hope Mr Onac does not teach statistical analysis or any science subjects where careful objective reasoning is required (though amazingly he appears to have a mathematics degree). At least he appears to be able to multiply by 2 when working out family savings!
- Dr J Roberts, London
Morning:
14°c

























