Morning:
8°c
Transport chiefs stunned as £2.4bn is slashed from spending
Dick Murray, Transport Editor30 Oct 2008
BILLIONS of pounds were today cut from spending on the railways just 24 hours after the Government said it planned to make "best use" of the national transport networks.
Network Rail, responsible for the national infrastructure including tracks, signals and stations, planned to spend £29.1 billion between next year and 2014. This has been cut back to £26.7 billion in a plan laid down by the Office of Rail Regulation today.
That is £2.4 billion less than what NR considers "essential".
Senior figures at the network were stunned. One said: "The money is not enough for what we had planned."
Transport Secretary Geoff Hoon yesterday announced a programme of works "to ensure we make the best use of our national transport networks and accelerate the process of identifying where future expansion is needed".
But the cutbacks put scores of improvement plans at risk of cancellation or delays.
The shortfall also threatens a major political confrontation over the funding of the railways, used by more than three million people a day.
There were clear signs that ministers were behind the cutback.
Bill Emery, chief executive of the Office of Rail Regulation, said: "In this particular process we have been given a clear steer from the Government on the output it requires from the industry and the public funds they are going to make available to the industry. We worked within that framework."
Passenger numbers on many routes, including London commuter lines, are forecast to increase by up to 50 per cent over the coming decade.
NR had planned to spend £30.5 billion between 2009 and 2014. It then cut this back to £29.1 billion saying that was the "bottom line" figure.
The ORR, however, today ruled the network must improve its housekeeping and cut costs.
Chris Bolt, chairman of the ORR, announced in July that the network, a not-for-profit organisation, should be limited to £26.5 billion, a target which NR branded "unrealistic".
The ORR today said the network must improve its efficiency by 21 per cent by 2014. It is also demanding:
● 93 per cent of local London services to run on time.
● A 20 per cent reduction in late and cancelled trains for which NR is responsible.
● A reduction in disruption caused by engineering work.
● A 25 per cent reduction "at least" in delays caused by freight trains, a frequent cause of disruption.
The ORR says the money will be enough to deliver all the benefits to passengers laid down by the Government's output specifications including expansion of the network through Thameslink and speeding-up train services through London Bridge and Reading, both notorious bottlenecks.
Paul Plummer, NR's director of planning and regulation, said the target was "clearly challenging".
Reader views (7)
I have noticed that train cancellations at peak times are suddenly increasing. Coincidence?
- Bloke, London, 31/10/2008 11:20
Report abuse
Can I ask the hard-boiled cynics to look at the Network Rail website?
- Alan Griffiths, Forest Gate, LONDON. UK, 30/10/2008 19:06
Report abuse
It does seem lots of money gets wasted on Nu Labor friends and family but not on actual accomplishments, Crash Gordon!
- Jacqueline, Hampstead, London, 30/10/2008 17:02
Report abuse
Wonder how much of the £26bn will be left after the contractors, consultants and other hangers-on have had their slice of the cake.
- John Buckeridge, Harrow, 30/10/2008 16:53
Report abuse
Typical Government policy-for decades public transport in the UK has been underfunded and overpriced, so that in comparison to countries such as France and Germany our trains and buses are a sick joke. How does anyone expect use of private cars to stop increasing when there is often no alternative? Meanwhile, this regime's obsession with expansion of airports continues apace while rail expansion is sidelined...talk about stupidity and lack of vision!
- Jon Kent, Hertford. UK, 30/10/2008 14:02
Report abuse
The railways are the real place where you see the super hypocrisy of Gordon Brown and crew. Lots of money around for a third runway at Heathrow and lots of spending on adding lanes to the M25, but when it comes to the railways (which are by far the most efficient means of transport), reduced funding. Hypocrisy, thy name is Brown.
- Phil Jones, London UK, 30/10/2008 13:59
Report abuse
£26bn to build a new railway? Bus in a load of French people - they did theirs for a fraction of that cost.
- Nobby Clark, Perth, Scotland, 30/10/2008 13:11
Report abuse
