Weather Tonight: 4°c Partly Cloudy Night Morning: 8°c Cloudy

News

Iraq invasion legal advice 'flawed'


18.11.08

Legal advice given to Tony Blair prior to the invasion of Iraq was fundamentally "flawed", a former senior law lord has said.

Lord Bingham, who stepped down in July, described the action by the UK and US as a "serious violation of international law".

He said advice by the then-Attorney General Lord Goldsmith failed to acknowledge the lack of hard evidence implicating Iraq's non-compliance with UN resolutions. Furthermore it neglected to make clear that only the Security Council could authorise further action, Lord Bingham suggested.

But Lord Goldsmith said that he stood by his advice to the then-prime minister.

Lord Bingham's comments came in a speech on the rule of law at the British Institute of International and Comparative Law. In it he referred to a statement made by the former attorney general in March 2003 as Britain prepared for the invasion.

"This statement was flawed in two fundamental respects," he said. "It was not plain that Iraq had failed to comply in a manner justifying resort to force and there were no strong factual grounds or hard evidence to show that it had."

"Hans Blix and his team of weapons inspectors had found no weapons of mass destruction, were making progress and expected to complete their task in a matter of months."

Lord Bingham added that Lord Goldsmith's advice passed on the belief that a decision over whether Iraq had not complied with UN resolutions could be made by anyone other than the UN Security Council.

Responding to the criticism, Lord Goldsmith said: "I stand by my advice of March 2003 that it was legal for Britain to take military action in Iraq.

"I would not have given that advice if it were not genuinely my view. Lord Bingham is entitled to his own legal perspective five years after the event, but at the time and since then many nations other than ours took part in the action and did so believing that they were acting lawfully."

Reader views (2)

 Add your view

Would somebody please correct me if I'm wrong on this point but . . . Wasn't it Lord Goldsmith who was surrounded by controversy in relation to his "late change of mind" i.e. in favour of invading Iraq (without explanation) at the time, back in 2003?

- Fraser, Telford Park

Surely these are grounds for a possible treason trial against both Blair and Goldsmith.

One of the many (ignored)Anti-Iraq marchers

- Anon, London


Add your comment

 

Your email address will not be published

Terms and conditions make text area bigger You have  characters left.


 

Don't Miss
  • Berlin Wall

    Sex, lies and the Stasi

    On this day in 1989 the Berlin Wall was finally breached, ending the reign of East Germany’s feared security service. Here Anne McElvoy, who spent much of the Eighties in the city, recalls her encounters with the spooks
  • George Pringle

    The geeky-girl solo artists descending on the music scene

    Kookiness is what sells music these days and these opinionated artists have it in spades, says Jasmine Gardner

Why Sam's in the clear over that M&S dress

At last the truth about the M&S spotted dress that Sam Cam wore to the Conservative Party Conference

All stories


Promotions

The Open University

Every year The Open University helps thousands of professionals progress in their careers.


Win the Best Seats

In London theatre when you vote for your favourite celebrity spec wearer.


Breast Cancer Care

Donate £1 and leave a message of support for a loved one in the Swarovski Garden of Wishes.


Win an iPodTouch

With Courvoisier when you share your thoughts on this week's cocktail.