Weather Afternoon: 14°c Light showers Tonight: 9°c Light showers

News

HEADLINES:
Turkish Airlines Flight1951 lies in a field about 200 yards short of the runway at Amsterdam’s Schiphol airport
Broken into three: Turkish Airlines Flight1951 lies in a field about 200 yards short of the runway at Amsterdam’s Schiphol airport
Turkish Airlines Flight1951 lies in a field about 200 yards short of the runway at Amsterdam’s Schiphol airport Emergency services carry an injured passenger

Amsterdam air crash kills 9

Terry Kirby
25.02.09

At least nine people died and more than 50 were injured today when a Turkish Airlines plane crashed while attempting to land at Amsterdam's Schiphol airport.

Although the Boeing 737 broke into three parts, it did not catch fire, which is likely to have saved many lives. At least 130 people were on board.

The plane, Turkish Airlines flight 1951 which had left Istanbul at about 6.30 this morning, crashed just short of the runway outside the perimeter of the airport, near the A9 motorway.

There was initial confusion over the numbers of dead and injured with the Dutch authorities at first claiming that no lives had been lost. There were also discrepancies about the number of people on board, with the Turkish transport minister saying there were 143 and Candan Karlitekin, the chairman of Turkish Airlines, telling a news conference in Istanbul there were 127 passengers, including a baby, and seven crew.

Television pictures showed that the tail section of the plane had broken off and there was another large crack just behind the nose.

The aircraft was soon surrounded by scores of fire engines and ambulances from the airport. Survivors were taken to a sports hall to be reunited with relatives. Dutch television said rescuers had been hampered getting to the scene as the field had recently been ploughed.

"I saw the plane lying there in three pieces," Nikolai van der Smagt, who works for a telecom company near Schiphol airport, told BBC News. He said he was driving past moments after the crash and saw the plane surrounded by large clouds of brown dust and grey smoke.

"The first people were just getting off the plane and they looked confused. There was a lot a dust, but no fire," he said. As rescue operation began, flights to and from the airport were briefly suspended but resumed later in the morning.

The Dutch government said it had no details of the identities of the dead and injured. "Our thoughts go out to the people who were in the plane and of course also to those who are now waiting in uncertainty to hear about the fate of their loved ones," a statement said. "Many families in the Netherlands and also in Turkey are waiting in fear."

There was no immediate word on what caused the crash, which happened in light mist about 60 metres from of the airport perimeter. Terrorism was said to have been ruled out. It is the worst air accident in the Netherlands since an El Al cargo plane crashed into high-rise apartment blocks in a suburb of Amsterdam in October 1992, killing 43 people, 39 on the ground. It crashed shortly after take-off when two engines broke off.

The last crash involving a Turkish Airlines plane was in 2003 when at least 65 people died in eastern Turkey.

Schiphol airport has six runways and one major passenger terminal. In 2007, it handled 47million passengers, making it the fifth busiest airport in Europe.

Reader views (3)

 Add your view

Advantage of the ploughed land however was that a lot of the initial impact energy was absorbed by it. With grassland and synthetic turf the impact energy likely would have had a far more serious effect on the plane itself and on the people inside, probably resulting in more fatalities.

- William Gosselink, Amsterdam

Peter is quite right and if this crash had been at Heathrow it would have been very different as there is development right up to the boundaries most of it car parks or roads.

- Jack Spratt, Richmond, England

Land immediately surrounding airports ought not to be ploughed.Landowners should be financially helped to maintain grassland in these vulnerable areas. And prefferably synthetic turf - as used on or near several US airports - eliminating food sources and shelter for wildlife which can fly into aircraft, and dust effecting visibility for pilots.

- Peter Seekings-Foster, Mildenhall, Suffolk.


Add your comment

 

Your email address will not be published

Terms and conditions make text area bigger You have  characters left.


 

Don't Miss
  • Lenny Henry

    Lenny Henry: 'Maybe one day we can have a black Doctor Who'

    Shortlisted at today's Evening Standard theatre awards for his role as Othello, Lenny Henry has come a long way from black and white minstrels
  • John and Edward

    Spread of the Jedhead

    Jedward, voted off the X-Factor this weekend, are the most obvious proponents of the sticky-uppy look - but the style crosses boundaries of age, gender, sexuality and taste, says Nick Curtis

Sky in plot to hire students on the cheap

Sky News is currently recruiting students as reporters for its coverage of next year's general election. However, the opportunity doesn't quite seem so appealing

All stories


Promotions

Environmental initiatives

Find out how you can help to meet the challenges of climate change in London.


The Open University

Every year The Open University helps thousands of professionals progress in their careers.


Win the Best Seats

In London theatre when you vote for your favourite celebrity spec wearer.


Breast Cancer Care

Donate £1 and leave a message of support for a loved one in the Swarovski Garden of Wishes.


Win an iPodTouch

With Courvoisier when you share your thoughts on this week's cocktail.