Morning:
6°c
Ex-traffic officer is making £1million a year out of courses for drivers who speed
Robert Mendick, Chief Reporter2 Mar 2009
A FORMER traffic policeman and his wife are making millions of pounds running courses for drivers caught speeding, the Evening Standard reveals today.
Chris Howell is profiting from police policy which allows motorists to escape fixed three-point penalties by attending driving classes.
Last year Mr Howell and his wife Philippa received a £1.3million dividend paid by his company DriveTech. Pre-tax profits more than doubled to £2.6million - 18 months after launching London's speed awareness scheme.
Mr Howell's business is so successful he is now reckoned to be one of the highest paid ex-police officers in the country. The Association of Chief Police Officers said it was "deeply concerned" by the sums being earned by DriveTech.
"This scheme should not lay people a golden egg," said ACPO's Ian Aspinall, who is in charge of speed awareness courses nationally, adding: "It is all about community safety. This should not be about making money."
A spokesman for the Association of British Drivers, a motorists' pressure group, said: "People should not be getting rich on motorists driving marginally over the speed limit."
The DriveTech course is 90 minutes shorter than the current ACPO-standardised model. At £95 it is also more expensive than many other four-hour training courses, which can cost as little as £60.
The fee and length of course was set by the London Safety Camera Partnership, a body set up by Transport for London, the Met and others, to cut the number of accidents.
DriveTech receives a flat fee to run the courses although TfL refuses to say how much it is paid, citing confidentiality. A TfL source pointed out all revenue, once the Drivetech fee is taken out, is invested in road safety schemes across London.
DriveTech runs courses for the Met, City of London police and Thames Valley Police as well as smaller forces in Northumbria, Derbyshire and Hampshire. It paid a dividend to shareholders of almost £1.3million for the year ending 1 March last year. Mr Howell and his wife Philippa own 98 per cent of DriveTech's shares. It is not clear what proportion of DriveTech's turnover and profits are derived from the safety courses. The company also operates a fleet business, providing training to "predominantly blue-chip clients" such as ICI and Sainsbury's as well as a driving school.
Mr Howell, 46, set up DriveTech in 1990 after 10 years at Thames Valley Police, where he was a traffic officer based at Woodstock in Oxfordshire. He now lives with his wife in a large detached home in a private road in Maidenhead, which he bought for £975,000 in 2007. He recently bought DriveTech's headquarters in Crowthorne, Berkshire, for £650,000.
Mr Aspinall, who runs ACPO's driver offender re-training scheme, said: "Every pound that goes elsewhere out of this initiative is a pound lost to road safety."
He pointed out that some forces used a not-for-profit company to run the speed awareness courses with any profits reinvested in road safety. But he also emphasised that Drive-Tech had an excellent reputation for running speed awareness courses.
DriveTech said today it had reinvested "a significant amount of money" in supporting road safety initiatives over the past five years.
It also pointed out it had been running a "very successful commercial business since November 1990" - long before speed awareness schemes were launched. The firm now employs 300 people.
TfL said speed awareness courses had been hugely successful since launching in the capital in August 2006.
How motorists learn their lesson
■About 300,000 motorists have attended speed awareness courses nationally.
■The courses are offered to motorists caught on camera only slightly over the speed limit, according to a mathematical formula devised by the Association of Chief Police Officers.
■The formula means motorists caught doing less than 39mph in a 30mph limit and 50mph in a 40mph limit may be offered a course.
■They are offered at random, allowing drivers to escape a three-point penalty by attending the course instead.
■Only about half the 43 police forces in England and Wales offer the scheme.
■London's course is about 90 minutes shorter than most but at £95 is more expensive. This is put down to higher office rental costs and Londoners each having their own computer on the course.
■Initial research by ACPO suggests the re-offending rate could be as low as one per cent for those signing up to the courses.
Reader views (12)
She claims she was only doing 32 mph. She easily 'forget's' that her measured speed was actually much higher. The 32 mph figure was arrived at by deducting 10% off the measured speed and then a further 2 mph rounded down to the nearest whole number was deducted from that, so when she was clocked at 38 mph the deductions left a figure of 32 mph. She was therefore fortunate to get the offer of a remedial session istead of a mandatory fine and points.
A call to a driving instructor for remedial lessons is a much better option for people who have let their standards drop below that of a safe and prudent driver. And far less embarrassing too!
- Rj, Notts, 03/03/2009 00:45
Report abuse
Yes this man is an ex-police officer but he left the service in 1990, aged 28 to start his own business. After nineteen years I wouldn't call it a golden egg "for one of the boys", instead its a well built and solid business built over the years. Credit where credit is due. End of story.
- Mike, Berlin, Germany, 02/03/2009 22:29
Report abuse
I dont see anything wrong this cimpany employees 300 people doing specialist training. I have seen the "not for profit" businesses who are useless.
- Sue, Dorset, 02/03/2009 21:08
Report abuse
Your headline implies making loads from camera's, but then it turns out he employs 300 people in a whole raft of driver training avenues so it's a bit misleading. Unlike taxation, speeding is a choice.
- Ben, Chiswick, 02/03/2009 19:21
Report abuse
This is wrong.
I was offered one of these courses after going 4mph over the speed limit - downhill as I was joining on to a very fast section of the south circular.
I received a letter offering me 3 points or 2 hours watching a video at Drivetech.
I am glad they are making money, but this seems very underhand to me.
- Barry L Smith, London, 02/03/2009 15:43
Report abuse
At £95.00 ago its a nice little earner, pity none of it gets back to making roads safer or proper policing of our roads rather than cash cow camera's. As per usual another stealth tax by Gov. with motorists paying
- Mike, London England, 02/03/2009 15:10
Report abuse
Good luck to him. Why are we always taking pot-shots at those who make a go of it?
No doubt he left a fairly decent paid stable job, with a final salary pension, and ran the risk of losing it all.
Get over your jealousies, and for once applaud those who work within the law and make a success of it.
- Scott, London, 02/03/2009 14:00
Report abuse
Josie - I don't understand - "why take the points" (and the penalty fine). What did that achieve apart from you avoiding having to spend a couple of hours being told off for lack of speed awareness?
- Julia, london, 02/03/2009 12:55
Report abuse
ACPO should keep their snouts in their centrally funded feeding bowl. What concern is it of theirs.
- Jack Spratt, Richmond, England, 02/03/2009 12:08
Report abuse
I was "offered" one of these courses when I was caught by one of the Met's tax cameras doing 32 in a 30 zone. I took the points instead. It was the first time I've ever been caught "speeding" - and that only because the signs on the side of the road said 40. After I got the ticket I drove back down the route again (its an area I don't normally drive in) and saw the 30 sign - obscured by tree branches! This is not about safety - its about raking in money.
- Josie, London, 02/03/2009 10:50
Report abuse
It seems ACPO are annoyed that THEY aren't making a profit from this, they seem to be making millions from other schemes but this one slipped through their greedy little hands. Whatever happened to making a punishment fit the crime?
- Ranter, Maidstone, UK, 02/03/2009 10:18
Report abuse
So he saw a gap in the market and is providing a service at a profit. Since when was that wrong?
- Jc, london, 02/03/2009 10:16
Report abuse
