Reader views (15)

 Add your view

Hackney Council should listen to its community sometimes and not just to its own voice - the organisation that decided that what the borough needed was Ocean (now bankrupt) for its culture.

- Oliver, London

I CANNOT believe someone has ruined the stencil, what a waste of time! Actually something interesting in the bland land that is Dalston

- Dan, London

someone has tried to paint it back in hmmm not sure if its worked....

- Jem, London UK

It's already been vandalised (daubed with paint) so I suppose that ends the argument.

- Anthony, Dalston

LONG LIVE BANSKY!!!!

- Joner, san jose ,ca

Banksey creates witty and provocative images, and ironically, Duncan from Kent has been a success for Banksey in that Duncan reacted to Banksey's artistic voice and intent. I would guess that that is what Banksey 'revels in' and that is where the value of street art lies.

- Krystie, Australia

Sorry I just don't get this, this is graffiti and vandalism.
Why don't hackney just charge Banksy and take him/her to court?.
This is Carte Blanche for all the others to claim their vandalism is art so they are also exempt from criminal charges.
Banksy is a criminal and vandal. End of.

- Grumpy, london

I seriously doubt Banksy himself intended it to be permanent, just "controversial" enough to get it covered by the mainstream media (at which he has succeeded) thereby raising his brand value.

- Cary Portway, New York, NY

The rules only apply to a certain section of society.

- Frank, Home Counties, England.

Please stop feeding this man's overinflated ego. It's not 'art' it's the emperors new clothes. The council is perfectly right to clean it off and should charge the man for his vandalism.

If Banksy wants to create street art get kids in schools involved in projects that have council approval. Anyone who would pay money for his 'pictures' is barking mad. Another exampole of the great rock and roll swindle.

The only saving grace is that he is not getting funds that people like Hirst and Emin make for there egotistical modern art you have to be intelligent to understand it rubbish.

Anyone who pays vast sums for artwork patently doesn't understand it and anyone who makes 'art' purely for vast sums of cash clearly is a business tycoon and not an artist. Banksy may not get the cash for his projects but he revels in the values they obtain

- Duncan, Kent

Alan Laing from Hackney Council refers to keeping the streets clean - but isn't this piece of art on a wall that is not in the ownership of the Council.

Hackney Council is also quite happy to spend money putting up vast advertising banners on lamp-posts without seeking the views of residents who have to look at them. That Mr Laing is vandalism.

- Neil, London

If they had brains at Hackney Council they'd sell it on the art market and use the money for the community. Don't Banskies go for 7 figure sums these days? I'm sure a cash strapped council like Hackney would benefit from that. Whatever you think of it's artistic merits, surely there is more to be made of this than washing it off? Seems very short sighted.

- Mcw, London

Who is to judge whether this is really "art" or just an eye sore. Personally, I'd say it was the latter and should be washed off. There is plenty of evidence that toleration for graffiti sets a wider context for anti-social behaviour and an ugly and unsafe local community. If Banksy was really worried about the consequence he would't have put it there in the first place.

- Alan, London

Hackney council is philistine and reactionary. They should leave Banksy's work alone. Hackney is a dump and needs art like this to brighten the place up.

- Jon, London

"Our position is not to make a judgment call on whether graffiti is art or not, our task is to keep streets clean."

Jobsworth

- St, LondON

Add your comment