Weather Tonight: 9°c Light showers Morning: 14°c Overcast

News

HEADLINES:

Obama lifts ban on federal cash for stem cell research

Paul Thompson in Miami
09.03.09

President Barack Obama plans to lift his predecessor George Bush's restrictions on federal funding for stem cell research today.

The long-promised move will allow a rush of research aimed at better treatment, if not cures, for ailments such as diabetes, Parkinson's and paralysis.

The research has been backed by prominent Americans including President Reagan's widow Nancy, whose husband suffered from Alzheimer's disease, and the late actor Christopher Reeve, who was paralysed in a horse riding accident.

But it is opposed by some religious and conservative groups on moral grounds because days-old human embryos must be destroyed to obtain the stem cells. They are typically taken from fertility-clinic leftovers that would otherwise be thrown away.

President Obama was also making a broad declaration today that science, not political ideology, would guide his administration.

"I would simply say this memorandum is not concerned solely - or even specifically - with stem cell research," said Harold Varmus, chairman of the White House's Council of Advisers on Science and Technology and a Nobel Prize-winning biologist.

He said it would address how the government uses science and who is advising officials across federal agencies.

George Bush limited taxpayer money for stem cell research to a small number of stem cell lines that were created before 9 August 2001.

Scientists say newer lines - groups of cells that can continue to propagate in lab dishes - were better suited to creating treatments, but had to be supported by private donors.

The proposed changes do not fund the creation of new lines, nor specify which existing lines can be used. But they mean that scientists working with newer lines can apply for government money for the research.

Tony Perkins, president of the conservative Family Research Council, said: "I believe it is unethical to use human life, even young embryonic life, to advance science.

"While such research is unfortunately legal, taxpayers should not have to foot the bill for experiments that require the destruction of human life."

Reader views (0)

 Add your view

No comments have so far been submitted.


Add your comment

 

Your email address will not be published

Terms and conditions make text area bigger You have  characters left.


 

Don't Miss
  • Lenny Henry

    Lenny Henry: 'Maybe one day we can have a black Doctor Who'

    As he wins the outstanding newcomer prize at the Evening Standard theatre awards for his role as Othello, Lenny Henry has come a long way from black and white minstrels
  • John and Edward

    Spread of the Jedhead

    Jedward, voted off the X-Factor this weekend, are the most obvious proponents of the sticky-uppy look - but the style crosses boundaries of age, gender, sexuality and taste, says Nick Curtis

Sky in plot to hire students on the cheap

Sky News is currently recruiting students as reporters for its coverage of next year's general election. However, the opportunity doesn't quite seem so appealing

All stories


Promotions

Environmental initiatives

Find out how you can help to meet the challenges of climate change in London.


The Open University

Every year The Open University helps thousands of professionals progress in their careers.


Win the Best Seats

In London theatre when you vote for your favourite celebrity spec wearer.


Breast Cancer Care

Donate £1 and leave a message of support for a loved one in the Swarovski Garden of Wishes.


Win an iPodTouch

With Courvoisier when you share your thoughts on this week's cocktail.