Weather Tonight: 8°c Light showers Morning: 13°c Light showers

News

HEADLINES:
Anjem Choudary
Islam UK: Muslim extremist Anjem Choudary claims he is engaged in a “jihad of the word”

‘Britain’s most reviled man? I wear that badge with pride’

David Cohen
13.03.09

Anjem Choudary says he understands that the Islamic protesters who this week greeted British troops returning from Iraq with placards calling them "murderers" and "butchers" are not helping to improve community relations.

"I can see that the British public will regard the protesters as insensitive," he says, smiling. "But in my opinion, that is outweighed by our sensitivities to families in Iraq who've lost relatives at the hands of the British. The troops were not heroes, but cowards, doing the bidding of a British government engaged in state-sponsored terrorism."

Speaking exclusively to the Evening Standard in an East London coffee shop that has been cleared of other customers ahead of our arrival - a 6ft 4in minder sits off to the side - the British-born Muslim extremist crudely likens the home-coming troops of the 2nd Battalion Royal Anglian Regiment to "Nazis".

"Those British troops are guilty of torture and atrocities in Iraq and we Muslims will not swallow the argument that as soldiers, they were just following orders."

Choudary, who offers no proof to back up his claims, is a lawyer by training. While almost all the other high-profile "preachers of hate" find themselves imprisoned or deported, Choudary, 41, enjoys freedom in the UK, despite the fact that he has helped found two jihadist Islamist groups - Al Muhajiroun and Al-Ghurabaa - both since banned for "glorification of terrorism".

His fanatical views have made him possibly the most reviled man in Britain, but he is unrepentant.

"That's a badge I would wear with pride," he says. "It's inevitable that when you offer an alternative morality and way of life, many people will hate you for it." He characterises Britons - "with their alcohol, gambling, prostitution and pornography" - as "living like animals in a jungle".

But if he hates the British way of life, why stay? "There are parts of the lifestyle, such as fish and chips, I like very much," he quips. "For the rest," he shakes his head. "But I was born in this country, I was educated here, I have every right to stay."

He refuses, though, to see any hypocrisy in the fact that his East London-based family - he is separated from his wife, Rubana Akhtar, with whom he has three young children, aged 13, nine and three - live on benefits of allegedly £25,000 a year, funded by the taxpayers he despises.

He does not deny that he receives benefits (he won't confirm how much), or that he uses the NHS, or that his children attend state-funded faith schools, but he bristles at my proposition that taking handouts compromises his position.

"I don't think it's of any importance," he says. "People think that those who live off benefits are in some way criminal or less intelligent. It's a way of vilifying me, but it's irrelevant to my ideological views and to what I do."

Another subject Choudary is sensitive about is reference to his undergraduate days at Southampton University where he was known as "Andy" and earned a reputation as a womaniser into "cider, casual sex, cannabis and LSD".

Although fellow students who say they took drugs with him have come forward to substantiate these claims and to remark that "he didn't seem very religious at the time", Choudary insists the story is "a fabrication" peddled by his enemies to discredit him.

The son of a market stall holder of Pakistani descent in Welling, south-east London, Choudary was nevertheless a secular Muslim who became radicalised only when, after qualifying as a solicitor, he met firebrand preacher Sheikh Omar Bakri Mohammed at a mosque in Woolwich.

Later, Choudary became his right-hand man in the post 9/11 formation of Al-Muhajiroun, but with Bakri exiled in Lebanon since 2005 after vowing that Muslims would "give the West a 9/11 day after day", Choudary became the Islamists' militant spokesman in the UK.

These days, Choudary is associated with the radical website Islam For the UK and the fundamentalist sect Ahlus Sunnah wal Jamaah, a secretive group founded in London in 2005 as a successor to Al-Muhajiroun.

They claim up to 1,000 members, and it was the Luton branch of this sect, admits Choudary, who organised the anti-troops demonstrations this week.

Their ultimate aim, he says, is "to fly the flag of Allah above 10 Downing Street" and bring about - "through jihad" - "a pure Islamic State with Sharia law in Britain".

Asked what the system of Sharia would mean for westerners living in England, Choudary, who no longer practises conventional law and is now a judge in the Sharia Court of the UK, says: "Every woman, whether Muslim or non-Muslim, would have to wear a traditional burkha and cover everything apart from her face and hands in public. There is a view that women would also wear the niqab [full face veil], but only in certain circumstances.

"In matters to do with the judicial system and the penal code, one male witness is sufficient to counter the testimony of two females. Also, anyone one becomes intoxicated by alcohol would be given 40 lashes in public. And people who commit adultery would be stoned to death."

The fact that no pure Islamic state exists outside Saudi Arabia, and that it's unlikely to win many converts in Britain, does not deter Choudary. But the mechanism for turning our liberal democracy into a regressive Islamic state is a trickier subject to broach.

Such a revolution can only come about through "jihad", Choudary admits. There are two types: jihad of the sword, and jihad of the word. "I am engaged in jihad of the word," he states.

But that could entail inciting people to violence: is he guilty of inspiring the next generation of suicide bombers?

Only last month, British Army officers in Afghanistan complained they were engaged in "a surreal mini civil war" with homegrown jihadists "bizarrely sporting British accents who'd travelled there to support the Taliban.

Has he ever had young Muslims come to him and say they want to leave Britain to do jihad against our troops abroad?

"You know," he says, looking me in the eye, "there are some things one can't discuss. If it were true that people came to me, it would not be wise for me to tell you. But let me say this: what I say publicly is what I say privately. If they ask about doing jihad in this country, I tell them they live here under a covenant of security and that they are not allowed to kill people or target their wealth."

If Choudary is being on the level, you'd logically expect him to condemn, outright, the home-grown terrorist attacks of 7 July 2005 on London, yet invited to do just that, he refuses.

"I'm not in the business of condemning or condoning them," he says. "If I condone them, you will say I am supporting terrorists and glorifying terrorism. But if I condemn it, tha t'll give the green light [for British troops] to do whatever they want abroad without thinking there'll be repercussions in this country.

"Rather I think what we should do is look at the root causes of 7/7, like the bombing by the British and the Americans of Afghanistan and Iraq."

But what does he say to those who want to leave to do jihad abroad? Does he fire them up or deter them? "If your family is subject to terrorism by Britain, I think it's natural you'd want to go help them," he says. "But now you're asking me questions which you know, and I know, are contrary to the glorification of terrorism [laws] and inciting people to acts of terrorism, and I'm not going to be entrapped."

But it's only a trap if he encourages them to go. All Choudary has to say is that he doesn't, wouldn't. But he won't.

I remind him of inflammatory comments he'd made four months ago at a public meeting in Newham when he said: "There are three types of Muslims: those in prison, those of us on our way [to prison], and non-practising Muslims."

Which one is he? "I live under the expectation that I could be taken to prison at any time. We have an absurd kangaroo legal system in this country. The sooner we overthrow it and implement Sharia, the better."

Does he model himself on Osama bin Laden? "I am an ordinary Muslim but let me tell you something: Sheikh Osama bin Laden is more popular in the Muslim world than any leader in charge. If there were elections in countries across the Muslim world today, he would win every one of them."

How would he like to be remembered? As a terrorist or a man of peace? "If terrorism is calling for the Sharia, supporting the innocent civilians being tortured and abused abroad, then yes, I'm the biggest terrorist in the world. But if by terrorism you mean the use of violence for political ends and not caring about the lives of ordinary people, then the biggest terrorists in the world are Gordon Brown and George Bush."

Our time is almost up, but I test his sense of humour with one last question: does he ever bump into anyone from his Southampton days who still remembers him as Andy? His face clouds over. "Turn off your tape recorder," he demands, "I'm ending the interview here and now."

Suddenly his minder is towering over me. "If you don't turn that off, I will take it off you and you'll never see it again," he says menacingly. And with that Choudary stands abruptly and makes some bizarre derogatory comment about me probably being a paedophile. The veneer of gentility shattered, he strides out of the café without so much as a backward glance.

Reader views (13)

 Add your view

Mark,

Sadly you are correct, many Americans (like me) cannot understand how some Brits and the rest of Western Europe can be so tolerant of intolerance.

For what it is worth : There is also a growing concern here of Islamic fanatics with British passports.

"live on benefits of allegedly £25,000 a year"
Wow, that is so much. I guess one advantage of being less socialized like America is that those that do not work in America do not even come close to having it this good. I think when it comes to getting immigrants to integrate into society our system is more effective. Of course our system is a lot more harsh, sink or swim.

- Austin, New York City, USA

That was not a demonstration(take note susan)that was incitement to hatred and personally insulting and as such it was likely to constitute a breach of the peace, and the police have a right to ban any gathering that is likely to cause a breach of the peace,and /or arrest the people involved, and that is what should have happened.

- Kev, London-UK

"why have the protestors against our marching soldiers not been charged with 'behaviour likely to cause a breach of the peace' Martin, UK


Martin: they haven't been charged because we live in a free speech democracy and people are not locked up for expressing a view that is contrary to the government's.

- Susan, London

may my god help us in times like these, who do these people think that are coming into ARE country steal are homes, jobs, steal from the goverment ,mock are ways of living( yet we are not allowed to mock them as this would be classed as racism)and yet we sit there and take it all in. When will this ever stop and let us live are lifes the way we know best which we have been doing for the last 5000yrs plus. If they do not like what they get in this country then why do they not go back to there own. Iam fed up with this SHUT UP OR PUT UP WITH IT.

- Pep, walthamstow

Instead of being at the demonstration, shouldn't he have been looking for work.

- Shallotman, Basildon

It should be clear by now to most intelligent and/or well educated people that there is no god - and that religion is just a (dangerous) waste of time. Given that most of us in the West haven't yet accepted this fact, we can hardly expect these strangely attired Flat-Earthers of the Middle East to embrace it. Until this changes, we are sadly stuck with the same tedious sermons and resulting commentaries. So, expect no change in our lifetimes then.

- Alex Sutherland, Siem Reap, Cambodia

Why is the Standard giving these bigots free publicity?

- Steve, Hereford

Heard him on the radio this morning saying if anyone does not like his freedom to protest they can leave the country.

The biggest supporter of this man and extremists like him, is this dangerously woeful incompetent Labour Government. If we are going to have a religious hate crime, it should also work to stop fundamentalist hate or be repealed.

Also if we had learned anything from Northern Ireland it should have been that faith schools are totally divisive of the community. It is nothing short of a disgrace that taxpayers' money should fund them.

On the subject of Labour, one only has to look at their economic policies to realise that they are trying to destroy this country. Their support of multi-culturism rather than integration has brought us a step closer to serious civil unrest.

With regard to Iraq, any right thinking person in the UK should know by now that it was an illegal war. That has not only cost many lives and wasted many billions of taxpayers' money but also had the opposite effect of the stated aim of a war on terror. By this criminal behaviour and by giving succour and financial support to fundamentalist extremists in the UK, whilst at the same time destroying our civil liberties. Our once great country has been systemically destroyed.

I for one will vote for any political party who will promise to bring the likes of Tony Blair and Gordon Brown to justice. We need decisive action now to remove the cancer in our society, before it is too late.

- Harry H, London UK

I'm british muslim and this guy is an idiot. Stop giving him attention. All the brits here who are outraged - I can understand you disagreeing with his views, but the there is no chance they will be supported by anyone in reality. Outrage should be reserved for real threats - this guy deserves to be ignored.

- Ia, London UK

The UK is the laughing stock of the world. These people spread hate and want to kill us and US, the tax payer are footing the bill for it. Is it me? Or is their something seriously wrong here?

- Mark, Leeds

they arrest two white guys protesting against the Muslim

protesters. but no Muslim protesters.

that's Britain under appeasing nulabour

- Arthur Ruse, dover uk

I have a simple question. Why have the protesters against our marching soldiers not been charged with "behaviour likely to cause a breach of the peace"?

- Martin, Bristol,UK

Under the government's new initiative - Flexible New Deal - all benefit claimants out of work for over a year now have to do community work to pay for their benefits.

- Maire, London


Add your comment

 

Your email address will not be published

Terms and conditions make text area bigger You have  characters left.


 

Don't Miss

Steamy scenes for Purnell in Turkish bath

Scheming over the future of the Labour Party continues even in the most unlikely places

All stories


Promotions

Environmental initiatives

Find out how you can help to meet the challenges of climate change in London.


The Open University

Every year The Open University helps thousands of professionals progress in their careers.


Win the Best Seats

In London theatre when you vote for your favourite celebrity spec wearer.


Breast Cancer Care

Donate £1 and leave a message of support for a loved one in the Swarovski Garden of Wishes.


Win an iPodTouch

With Courvoisier when you share your thoughts on this week's cocktail.