Tonight:
4°c
MPs face probes on homes and sex in the Commons
Joe Murphy and Nicholas Cecil23 Mar 2009
THE row over Commons expenses led to demands this evening for the second home allowance to be scrapped for MPs living within commuting distance of London.
At the same time there were calls for the Standards Commissioner to investigate the actions of a senior Labour MP accused of cheating on his wife by smuggling a woman into his Commons office late at night.
The expenses controversy grew after it was revealed that the Minister for London is facing an investigation into his claims.
A complaint was made to parliamentary watchdogs after Tony McNulty received £60,000 in second home allowances for time spent at the house in Harrow where his parents live, while his own house was just nine miles away in Hammersmith.
Liberal Democrat MP Sarah Teather put down a Commons motion calling for major reform of the second home rules, saying: "Thousands of commuter travel to work in Central London every single day, so why on earth shouldn't their MPs?"
John Lyon, the Standards Commissioner, will decide whether to launch a formal probe into the case which could sound the death knell of the Commons "gravy train".
He is already probing Home Secretary Jacqui Smith's claims for expenses after she cited her sister's spare room in London as her "main residence". The formal complaint against Mr McNulty, who is also Employment Minister, was made by Conservative MP Greg Hands, who said the minister's position was "indefensible".
In a letter to the Standards Commissioner, Mr Hands said there were several "potential breaches" of the rules involved. These include that it was unnecessary expenditure and that the fact his parents live there was likely to bring Parliament into "disrepute".
"He needs to be honest about exactly how he used this house," said Mr Hands. "It is essential that the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards gets to the bottom of whether Tony McNulty has been abusing parliamentary allowances."
Home Secretary Jacqui Smith is under investigation by Mr Lyon. Ms Smith claimed that her primary residence was a spare room in her sister's London house - and that her family home in the Midlands, where her husband and children live, was a second home, enabling her to receive £60,000 in expenses over five years.
Other London MPs have come under the spotlight, particularly the few who claim the maximum possible for running a second home despite being within commuting distance of Westminster. They now all face a major inquiry by the Committee On Standards in Public Life, which announced that it was going to review the wider issue of MPs' expenses claims.
The Prime Minister's spokesman said Gordon Brown had full confidence in Mr McNulty, but refused to discuss the specific allegations. "These are not really issues that relate to Mr McNulty's government responsibilities," he said. "These really are questions that arise in his capacity as a Member of Parliament and therefore it's not for me to get into that."
Labour MP Martin Salter, the MP for Reading West who does not claim a penny in second home allowance, said the expenses system should be reformed to avoid such controversies. "I think there may be better ways of doing things," he said.
An investigation by the Committee on Standards in Public Life is likely to lead to a root-and-branch overhaul of expenses. It could also look at MPs' pay.
Today Mr McNulty faced pressure to repay the Additional Costs Allowance he claimed over six years for the home he owns in his Harrow East constituency. Sir Alistair Graham, former chairman of the standards committee, said: "I think he has a few questions to answer. If he wasn't staying overnight there, and the claim's probably a bit dodgy anyway, there probably should be some money repaid." Sir Alistair stressed that the allowances for second homes was exclusively to pay for expenses incurred for overnight stays.
Mr McNulty was one of 16 London MPs identified by the Standard as taking taxpayers' money for a second home even though they all live less than an hour's commute from Westminster.
In Mr McNulty's case he lives with wife Christine Gilbert in a house three miles from Westminster but has claimed for the home in Harrow, nine miles away, in which his parents live. Claims made in 2006/07, the most recent year for such figures, included four London MPs who were jointly the highest claimers for expenses for the cost of living in two places.
●Barry Gardiner, Labour MP for Brent North, claimed £22,110 in 2006/07 although his constituency is 26 minutes from Westminster by public transport.
●Leyton and Wanstead MP Harry Cohen, Labour, whose constituency is 28 minutes from Westminster by Tube, also claimed £22,110.
●Conservative MP for Romford Andrew Rosindell, lives 40 minutes away. He too claimed £22,110.
●Ilford South MP Mike Gapes's constituency is 39 minutes away and the Labour MP claimed £22,110.
In the same year, Mr McNulty claimed £12,400 for the Harrow home, which he insists is regularly used for parliamentary work. But Conservatives questioned his defence, saying his constituency office where he holds weekly surgeries is less than two minutes drive away. Mr McNulty insisted he was within the rules to claim for the house. "I use it considerably," he said. He said he stopped claiming the allowance in January. "I reflected on it and thought I could probably do without claiming it."
The office of the Standards Commissioner this afternoon confirmed he had received emails of complaint over the conduct of Nigel Griffiths, the Edinburgh South MP who reportedly cheated on his wife in the Commons. Mr Griffiths has expressed "shame" over the reports in the News of the World and said his behaviour fell "below acceptable standards".
Reader views (70)
I HAVE GAVE UP MY BEGGING PITCH FREE TO ANY MP WHO IS ON MEAN TESTED BENIFIT
- John Patrick Green, nottingham, 01/05/2009 13:19
Report abuse
Aren`t we are talking about a Part-Time job here? There`s no clocking on and off and judging by "Today in Parliament" MPs are never there except on Wednesdays, so where are they?....writing a book, doing a TV show,attending a Directors Meeting, sitting in their "second home", carrying on with their second job or as they would have us believe spending all their time doing constuency work...a few maybe but come on...what do they take us for! They already have the shortest working hours, the shortest working week,the longest holidays, the highest pay and pensions for what they do and if it was based on payment by results they would be sacked for the mess made of the economy. As for trying to justify their antics by saying everybody does it! This is dispicable. Would such an excuse beaccepted in private business! But of course it`s "within the rules" isn`t! So what do the rules say?....Simply, that there are no rules! Grab what you can. And who approved the rules? Could it be that they were approved by MPs them selves!
This has been going on for years. Many have got away with it.Some may even be sitting in the House of Lords!
Then there`s the European Parliament. That`s another story! "Bring it on",as they say.
- Gordon Taylor, Huddersfield, UK, 09/04/2009 17:24
Report abuse
Force them to pay back the tax payers money for second homes for the last 8 years + charge them interest and then sack them. Simple.FK, Cpn, DK.
- Frank, Copenhagen, Denmark, 24/03/2009 09:04
Report abuse
Hi I belive that mp,s still do a good job for us.But as regards this expense account for second homes,all M.P.s. that have to spend the night in London should have accommodation provided for them by the leader of the house in fixed areas around london. This could then be a fixed amount,if this where to happen it would drastically reduce the expence account which would free up money to be used else were. If this where to happen it would be a step in the right direction.There should be no need for large amounts of money to be spent on second homes,what they do is a job of work if these amount where claimed on expence accounts in the private sector the tax man would be after them.
- Robert Clark, STEVEVANGE, 24/03/2009 08:05
Report abuse
Why stop at London MPs? I think we need a look at the whole lot of them, this is no doubt the tip of the iceberg.
- Jeremy, Chelmsford, Essex, 24/03/2009 01:49
Report abuse
so that's the deal, you get elected to parliament and you've won the lottery, so no reason to respect the voters who put you there then.
- John W, HAMILTON CANADA, 23/03/2009 22:51
Report abuse
Polititians wonder why the public are so apathetic when it comes to election turnouts. They only need to read this article to find out. If, as our home secretary claims, she is acting within the law, then quite obviously the law is wrong. These fools are tantamount to being legalised thieves and should hang their heads in shame. Let a "jury" of normal working people decide on what is right and fair, and not some government appointed body that will, by definition, return the findings that these magpies in government want them to.
- Alan, London, 23/03/2009 22:06
Report abuse
Is there an Oliver Cromwell about !
- Neil, Liverpool (UK), 23/03/2009 21:54
Report abuse
no wonder the sleaze-bags didn't want this information to be available for public scrutiny.
- Philip Smith, seaford, 23/03/2009 17:55
Report abuse
But these MP's expenses truly represent "Value" for "Money", don't they?
"Value" for the individual MPs concerned using the poor old taxpayer's "Money" ! ! !
Sweet!
- Fraser, Telford Park, 23/03/2009 17:54
Report abuse
Cameron hasn't come out against it either - the reason for this is that they are all bad as each other and Cameron would face the same backlash from his MPs as Brown would. New rules need to be brought in that have been set/evaluated by an external body - MPs have clearly shown they can't/won't 'police' themselves.
- Andy, london, 23/03/2009 17:53
Report abuse
The Right Honourable Tony McNulty:
Honourable– Adjective - not disposed to cheat or defraud; not deceptive or fraudulent.
- Deserving of esteem and respect;
- In conformance with justice or law or morality; "do the right thing and confess"
- A misleading title used by members of parliament.
- John, Forswt, 23/03/2009 17:52
Report abuse
Why don't you just put up your hands and admit you've been caught. Show the public you have a bit if backbone and resign. You are clearly not fit for government.
- Margy, London, 23/03/2009 17:38
Report abuse
OK so we are having to pay for their father's and in the case of Jackie Smith her sister's houses.
It about time all these Labour MPs were sent packing.
- John, Milton Keynes, 23/03/2009 17:29
Report abuse
Another day, another Nu Labour piggie with his snout in the trough.
- M, London, 23/03/2009 17:15
Report abuse
Now in summary we have had a deputy Prime Minister who punched a protester, A two homes secretary, A Justice Secretary recently rebuked, A twice sacked government minister recently knighted and made Business Secretary (due to him being unelected) A Lord Myner that overlooked a multimillion pound pension pot, an employment secretary that claims a second home allowance at his parents in London, then admits he didnt actually sleep their, just used it as an office. All led of course by an unellected prime minister who stays deep in his bunker unless theirs a Global Visit /Photo Opportunity somewhere to boost his own pathetic non popularity! Staggering - if Carlsberg could do Stench this would probably be the worst in history!!
- Wayne, Herts, Uk, 23/03/2009 17:10
Report abuse
Please wake up there will be nothing found.
- Alan, carlisle uk, 23/03/2009 17:10
Report abuse
Glad to see Barry Gardiner claiming 85 grand allowance when the constituency he represents is Brent North (around Wembley) and the house he CHOOSES to live in is in Rickmansworth, Hertfordshire (much further out).
Note how its mostly Labour MPs abusing the system.
- Graham, London, 23/03/2009 17:02
Report abuse
Gordon Brown stands by his cronies. No real surprise if you remember this idiot claimed for Sky Sports from the overburdened tax payer. Also £15.00, if memory serves, for lightbulbs.
Is there any circumstance known to man where these thieves actually put their hands in their own pockets instead of ours. Please enlighten me if you know of any.
But I wont be holding my breath.
- Alan, London, 23/03/2009 16:53
Report abuse
I note with great interest that Tony McNulty was one of the gravy train MP's that voted to keep generous expenses undisclosed, one can now see why!
How Westminster can continue to allow MP's to legally or otherwise milk the taxpayer in this odious way without major repercussions to their credibility is astounding.
The sense of decay and indifference itself is palpable.
While soldiers die for nothing, health care suffers cut after cut and suffering patients die from lack of cash for drugs these parliamentary terrorists continue to milk the country’s tax coffers and their only pitiful defence is “its ok it fine its allowed” even when its not allowed they carry on knowing they won't be fined or jailed
Disgraceful shameful and morally corrupt!
- Taxfodder, Cambridge UK, 23/03/2009 16:43
Report abuse
Brown says this issue does not relate to McNulty's role as a minister. Quite so: it has been some time since integrity has had any bearing on a parliamentarian's fitness for office.
- Jonathan Miller, Alfold, England, 23/03/2009 16:35
Report abuse
if g. brown believes it nothing to do with him, then its no wonder we all think MPs are only out for what they can get and have no interest in as they tell us serving the people. I never thought I would see our top leaders taking the cash whilst telling us how to behave.
- Derek Hillsdon, LE16 8DT, 23/03/2009 16:35
Report abuse
Re Mike, London. No,the old Theft Act was full of holes and was replaced by the new 2006 FRAUD ACT (implimented in late 2007). Mp's are are NOT exempt and can be prosecuted under sections 1-5 . Well worth a look on Search, Mike.
- Frank, Bristol UK, 23/03/2009 16:21
Report abuse
No wonder our taxes are so high yet public services so poor - the MPs that we employ spend their time devising ways of extracting more money with dodgy expenses, allowances and perks. I cannot understand why a second home allowance is needed - when MPs who represent constituencies outside London have to stay in the capital why don't they book into a budget hotel?
- Alan Summers, London NW2, 23/03/2009 16:19
Report abuse
It is not rocket science - those who have constituencies within 1.5 hours travel from Central London should not get anything (except for taxis home if Parliament sits after 9pm and the MP was in the chamber until after 9pm) - most of us have to travel to work and we can't claim it back. Those who live more than an 1.5 hours travel from Central London should be provided with a room at Travel Lodge or similar for the days they are ACTUALLY in Parliament (max 4 nights per week) plus second class train fare reimbursement. If they want to travel first class or upgrade their hotel they can pay for the upgrade out of their own pocket. If the MPs don't live in their constituency the travel is based on the location of the constituency. A record should also be published every term to show how many hours/days an MP is actually in Parliament and matched against hotel/train/taxi fares claimed. The only other expenses they can claim are secretarial/researchers at fixed scales and only for jobs that have been given to someone with no familial links to the MP. This will show who is dedicated to public service and those who are in it to make as much money as possible.
- Andy, London, 23/03/2009 16:12
Report abuse
Remember the argument used by the government against the fire-fighters? There was no need to increase fire-fighters pay because for every recruitment drive there was never a shortage of candaites.
So doesnt this apply for MP's too? Last time I looked there is always a number of people from each part wanting to be the candidate.
So it is not as if there is a shortage of people wanting to be an MP.
- Ian Gilbertson, Newcastle, 23/03/2009 16:11
Report abuse
No ifs, no buts, McNulty is dishonest and his claims should be investigated by the Police Fraud Squad.
- Neil, Gloucestershire, England., 23/03/2009 16:04
Report abuse
Is anyone concerned that the general public is losing faith in our so called politicians to be honest. Its"do as i say, but don't do as I do"!
- Terry Senton, hounslow middx, 23/03/2009 15:57
Report abuse
The header of the list in this article says 'here is how much the 49 London MPs who are eligible to Additional Costs Allowance'. The key word being 'eligible' so even the ES is saying these MPS ARE eligible so is it a problem of greed or necessity? Or just of public perception? Either way, I think a grown up discussion rather than political point scoring, and cast iron rules of actual eligibility are needed rather than picking on one or other MP whether Labour or Tory or Liberal. It's not just the parties who are suffering, it is democracy and public trust in it too.
- Richard, LONDON, 23/03/2009 15:50
Report abuse
Whiter than white indeed.
Step aside, Brown's Banana Republic's arrived!
- Dave, Cumbria, 23/03/2009 15:43
Report abuse
This is simply theft, how can anyone claim over £90k for expenses, they should all be fully investigated by a 3rd party and if they have be fiddled then charges of theft made against them, no more excuses
- Mike, London England, 23/03/2009 15:24
Report abuse
"I did nothing that is against the rules". How many times have we heard that in the past few years from our MPs?
That is the refrain used by the guards at the German Concentration camps in the Second World War.
Did not cut much ice at Nuremberg and other courts which answered to a higher moral standard.
Nor should it for these freeloaders but, knowing the stupidity of the voters, they will not bother about it at election time.
You get what you deserve.
- Minnie, London, UK, 23/03/2009 15:21
Report abuse
Funny how most of the big claiments are Labour MP's. Shame on them. They'd be benefits cheats if they weren't MP's.
- G Watson, London, 23/03/2009 15:20
Report abuse
If he had any personal integrity he would now hold his hands up and admit he just couldn't resist a freebie. Because he is fully aware of the high number of MPs already claiming for benefits who are also not justified in doing he now sadly believes that he is able to get away with it because if he is exposed then there are many more of them who will have to be also named and shamed. Gordon Brown knows this and if the true account of those who are claiming wrongly comes to light then this will truly reflect badly on him and the Labour party. Also this underhand claim is reflective of how competent a Minister he really is. The only benefit he should now be claiming is the less attractive, Job Seekers allowance. All I can say is there will be an even lower number of voters in the next general election (for both parties).
- Miriam, London, London, England, 23/03/2009 15:07
Report abuse
Mc Nulty rhymes with ‘guilty’
Expect a Whitewash from The Committee on Standards in Public Life .
There is still recourse in the Law .
Mp’s are liable for prosecution under the 2006 FRAUD ACT (Sections 1,2,3&5)
After the first conviction, expect them to go down like ninepins.
- Frank, Bristol UK, 23/03/2009 15:06
Report abuse
The Minster for Employment scrounging off the Tax Payer. Even more sleaze from New Labour,where are their morals. If he was a man of principle he would resign, but of course he will not. This whole government is rotten from top to bottom.
- Peter Deverell, dunstable, beds,england, 23/03/2009 14:54
Report abuse
This inquiry is long overdue.
Greedy MPs that see this as a lucrative way of boosting their salaries should be held accountable and removed from office. Any other person carrying out their duties, would be sacked immediately and have the police called into investigate.
- Joon, Streatham, South London, 23/03/2009 14:31
Report abuse
And I thought the Italian MPs were the biggest rip off artists.
But then they make 15,ooo Euros a month plus expenses.
Roughly £14,000 a month plus expenses.
- David Nigel Braham, Milan Italy, 23/03/2009 14:28
Report abuse
So these are the real chavs and benefit scroungers then!
- Chaz, London, UK, 23/03/2009 14:22
Report abuse
It just goes to show you can't be too careful...
- Liberal And Proud, London, UK, 23/03/2009 14:03
Report abuse
Just remember public representation is a privilidge granted by the voters. It should not be a career and it should not be a source of income to fund private ventures such as second homes.
MP's should take a much lower wage during their time in office and should only be given a basic travelodge allowance for overnight stays. If they want to stay somewher better they should fund it themselves.
The general population can no longer afford to support these spongers who ignore the general will of the people.
- Janice, London, 23/03/2009 13:56
Report abuse
War on sleazy MPs - about time!!
NuLabour are only there for personal gain.
- Anon, London, 23/03/2009 13:40
Report abuse
If people that wish to become MP’s were first selected and then elected by the constituents they wish to serve, things would change.
Those seeking to represent a constituency should find all their election funding from within the constituency they wish to serve. That would solve the sleaze in election funding.
A constituency should provide and audit any expenses that THEIR MP requires; they should probably buy and retain the ownership of any property required in London for THEIR current and future MP’s.
In reality we need government by the people for the people – the real meaning of democracy.
Government by the political elite for and on behalf of the political elite – is not democracy.
People often get confused about democracy because they are sucked into the beliefs of the political elite, who do not believe in democracy. They have distorted its meaning to give them and their club power to rule. Being allowed to choose from list put up by the political elite – is not democracy.
- Ian, Reading, England, 23/03/2009 13:36
Report abuse
Brown is doing himself no favours in continuing to give his "full confidence" to these ministers.
He talks of clamping down on tax-havens; the simple fact is he has to start cleaning up his own house first.
I think it's time these alowances were scrapped, and MPs discovered the Travelodge chain of hotels.
- Scott, London, 23/03/2009 13:32
Report abuse
Isn't it amazing that Tony McNulty claimed to have done nothing wrong. All MPs who has make similar expense claims are all questionable but the whole issue we have is the Parliamentary standards commissioner, John Lyon who looks into this is only a figure head, no bark, no bite and no nothing.
- Max, Isleworth, 23/03/2009 13:21
Report abuse
The lure of a job at Westminster seems to be only
about money and self-interest. It seems they put their
salaries up every year and set their own expenses. Then they title themselves Lords and Ladies, Dames and who knows what - and make more money and bonuses/pensions.
What has this got to do with government?
- Private, London, 23/03/2009 13:20
Report abuse
Yet another NuLabour MP stitching up the taxpayer.
- Dee Jay, Fleet Hampshire, 23/03/2009 13:14
Report abuse
£1,056,364 Labour
£571,982 Tories
Pay it all back plus interest
- Amoreno, Luxembourg, 23/03/2009 12:35
Report abuse
Its simply another example of how politics has become a profession. People should be in politics for the greater good of a society or a country not for personal gain or simply because they are unable to hack it in the world of business.
Politicians in the UK today need a lesson in humility its far too easy for them and even when they get things wrong their is no re-course against them. If a person in business were to behave like that they the end result would be the sack. Why is it any different for a politician.
- Mark, London, 23/03/2009 12:34
Report abuse
Pay it back - with interest.
- Undercover Elephant, London, UK, 23/03/2009 11:55
Report abuse
why do we even pay them a salary!? what do they actually use it for? they claim absolutely every thing as a 'living expense' meanwhile pocketing the 60k+ a year salary and probably (as most do) buy another house to rent out and earn even MORE money. I agree that non-cabinet MP's should be put up in council accomodation if they feel they need a base in London. They should be held accountable for their expenses, it is OUR money they was squandering. If this was capped it would plug a pretty decent hole in the public finances £2miliion quid spent by the london MPs alone
- Alanj, London, 23/03/2009 11:53
Report abuse
"I did nothing that is against the rules". How many times have we heard that in the past few years from our MPs?
It is time that the rules were changed, as they are fraudulent and corrupt. Not one privately-run company would have an expense system that allowed employees to claim rent on a house that is less than 10 miles from their place of employment, especially when they have their own property even closer. And don't get me started on their £23k allowance for plasma tellies and iPods.
The rules need changing, but more importantly, so do the people who abuse them.
- Nobby Clark, Perth, Scotland, 23/03/2009 11:52
Report abuse
These people think that we cant see when our own money is being nicked from under our noses under the guise of "tax". MP's should be ashamed of themselves. During the G20 summit we should also be demonstrating against this theft. It is disgraceful and shameful.
- Natty, London, 23/03/2009 11:49
Report abuse
I note that NO Liberal Democrat MP is claiming these expenses. Why no praise for them? Ed Davey is quite right to say these particular expenses aren't ethical.
- Nick, Richmond, 23/03/2009 11:21
Report abuse
I am convinced they rank one step below the bankers from RBS in the public opinion.
This is blatant abuse of the trust we place in those we elect.
- Ian Makin, twickenham, 23/03/2009 11:16
Report abuse
Have any of the people heard of public transport to get to and from work. Last I heard the Tube runs till midnight.
- Phil Johnson, Fareham Hants, 23/03/2009 11:13
Report abuse
It makes me laugh to think that these MPs who are abusing the system believe that they are any better than those benefit fraudsters they hunt down and punish. These people are thieves and the mind boggles at the fact that we elect them into office! One rule for the MPs and another for Joe and Josephine public.
- Sharon, London, 23/03/2009 11:12
Report abuse
Compared to MEPs this is petty cash.
- Bj, London, 23/03/2009 11:01
Report abuse
H'mm another review - to start in the Autumn, that'll get lost in the upcoming election and then forgotten about. (Or so GB etc wish)
- Jim, London, 23/03/2009 10:56
Report abuse
The solution is remarkably simple.
MPs must justify their expenses to HMRC as being wholly exclusively and necessarily incurred in the performance of their job, in the same way that normal folk have to justify expenses.
When MPs live by the same rules as everyone else they may take a greater interest in the inequities of Gordon Brown's tax regime.
- Inoff The Red, London UK, 23/03/2009 10:54
Report abuse
Our entire polity is hopelessly corrupt, because it is predicated upon a giant fraud.
- Neil M., london uk,, 23/03/2009 10:54
Report abuse
Its been same problem for years now with little or nothing ever done about it. Nice to have a high second income called expenses.
At one time the MPs were named and shamed with a list being published but nothing else.Its about time they were fully investigated as this simply is theft
- Mike, London England, 23/03/2009 10:51
Report abuse
The population are spied upon and taxed to the hilt while MP's demand secrecy and skirt the edges of fraud with their "expenses". Good idea Adam, house them in a council owned property. A vigorous inquiry must be held and ALL overpayments should be repaid.
- Patricia, LONDON, 23/03/2009 10:51
Report abuse
Absolutely disgraceful. We want our money back you thief!!!!!!!
- Thomas, London, 23/03/2009 10:47
Report abuse
It's totally immoral. How can this bunch of hypocrits expect respect when they condemn Fred Goodwin's greed and at the same time this sort of swindle is being perpetrated? Any other walk of life except politics, and they'd be sacked on the spot. But as usual it's do as I say, not as I do. We need a complete revolution in British politics, a brave man or woman to come forward and put an end to the whole culture of sleaze which is rife from top to bottom.
- David Smale, Doha Qatar, 23/03/2009 10:45
Report abuse
The 'major' enquiry to which you refer will encompass the expenses and allowances of all MPs, not just those based in London. It will not start until the autumn and has no connection with the recent publicity surrounding Tony McNulty's second home allowance.
- Val Daniels, Mijas Costa, Spain, 23/03/2009 10:42
Report abuse
No wonder they voted against making their expenses transparent. They are all at it, that is why Call me Dave has been very quiet on the issue because his lot are just as bad. If they were employed in the private sector they would at least be sacked or jailed. All voters should refuse to pay whatever tax they can eg council tax, car tax, tv licence and so on
- Trevn, Abu Dhabi, 23/03/2009 10:21
Report abuse
This is absolutely disgusting. Who do these people think they are? It is totally absurb that there is no effective external monitoring and contol over MP's allowances. It is our money that they are pilfering!
- Nms, London, 23/03/2009 10:07
Report abuse
Ban all second home payments to all MPs.
MPs who live have out of London Constituencies should be housed in council owned properties - perhaps a nice run down 1960's tower block.
As they will live within walking distance from Parliament there will be no need for ministerial cars as they can travel by public transport.
- Adam, Harrow, UK, 23/03/2009 09:59
Report abuse
You would have thought that these MPs would have had enough sense to get straight onto their Financial Advisers as soon as Derek Conway came onto the scene. But they haven't sorted themselves out yet. Now McNulty wants to do something about it when he had the chance a year ago. You don't really need the extra money, so get on with it! Or step down and go into the City.
- Dhanraj, basildon, 23/03/2009 09:43
Report abuse
