Afternoon:
10°c
Alcohol ban on streets that are magnet for drunks
Katharine Barney20 May 2009
Drinking is to be banned from some of London's wealthiest streets amid worries they are attracting a growing number of drunks.
Police in Kensington and Chelsea will be able to confiscate alcohol and fine anyone £500 if they refuse to hand over their drink after a trial of the measures to tackle anti-social behaviour in problem hot spots.
Earl's Court and the streets around Ladbroke Grove Tube in the north of the borough have been subject to the measures since 2003, but a study in the past two years showed that drunks were just moving on.
The three neighbouring authorities have implemented borough-wide bans, which councillors say is pushing street drinkers into Kensington and Chelsea's residential areas. The study found there were 1,257 incidents of anti-social behaviour involving drinking on the streets in the borough in the past two years.
Doreen Weatherhead, chairwoman of Kensington and Chelsea's enforcement committee, said: “Hammersmith and Fulham have done it, Westminster have done it, so these people will be looking for somewhere else to be without getting hassled and we don't want it to be here.
“It's something that gives the police powers to call a halt to the situations without having to go through the hassle of arresting someone for being drunk and disorderly.”
Residents groups welcomed the move, although said it was something that should have already been done. King's Road Association of Chelsea Residents said: “There's a real problem with enforcement and a real need for the police to be given new powers. With the risk that the problem could be exacerbated by the other boroughs doing the same thing, it's imperative the council brings in the moves.”
Westminster was the first to introduce the powers in 2002. Hammersmith and Fulham followed suit in 2006 and Brent the year after to ease problems with Wembley football drunks.
Reader views (7)
I enjoy a drink in the open air. I don't cause anybody any trouble. I object to lining the pockets of the super wealthy pub companies. Here goes another freedom and another attack on life in public spaces.
- Paul, Portland, UK, 29/09/2009 19:11
Report abuse
This is like when councils make an area a CPZ. Cars have to park in surrounding areas, which in turn demand to become CPZs. You end up with more and more people trying to park in fewer and fewer places. The problem is not solved, merely displaced to a neighbouring area.
Here we have drinkers being forced from one area to neighbouring areas, which in turn will move them into their neighbouring areas, which is OK, I suppose, for the rich people who are so good at getting rid of things that offend their eye.
Anyone notice how all our freedoms are being eaten away by this sort of attitude?
- Kate, London, 29/09/2009 18:11
Report abuse
Anything useful to suggest, Dudley?
- Jon, London, 29/09/2009 18:11
Report abuse
This will not cure anything. The same number of drunks will remain and simply move on and increase the number elsewhere.
- Dudley Piggott, Tbilisi, Georgia, 29/09/2009 18:11
Report abuse
I thought it already was an offence to have on open container of alcoholic liquid on a public highway.
Well, that's what I was told when working in an offy.
- Madmax, London, UK, 29/09/2009 18:11
Report abuse
Ban all alcohol consumption from our streets. You should only be able to consume alcohol from licensed premises/ area or your home where facilities are laid on. I am sick and tired of people urinating in our street and empty beer cans all over the place.
- Mike, London, 29/09/2009 18:11
Report abuse
I think the West-end always will attract night-life and revelers I don´t understand what they are trying to do there?!
- Georgie, Islington, London, 29/09/2009 18:11
Report abuse
