Afternoon:
10°c
Mayor Boris Johnson has ordered a new image and logo for the capital.
A global marketing campaign will celebrate London's diversity, from education to film and fashion.
But advertising agencies will be under instructions to play down the role of the City's bankers, tainted by the recession. Some £2million will be spent on the initiative.
City Hall wants to emulate the global recognition of New York's simple but effective "NYC" logo. Advertising agencies will receive an outline brief next week.
Londoners will be encouraged to submit ideas and may get the chance to vote for their favourite designs. City Hall director of marketing, Dan Ritterband, who is heading the campaign, said: "A strong brand identity is crucial to London and we are looking at ways of creating a more recognisable logo and slogan."
City Hall-sponsored events such as Trafalgar Square concerts and the New Year's Eve party will take on the updated look, which will also feature on merchandise.
The brand will be unveiled in February, at the start of a campaign timed to exploit the 2012 Olympics. Roadshows will visit the Winter Olympics in Vancouver, the Youth Olympics in Singapore, Delhi's Commonwealth Games and the World Expo in Shanghai.
"At the Olympics, the sport will look after itself but our challenge is to boost business on the back of it and a new brand is crucial to that," Mr Ritterband said.
Reader views (11)
Last year I made the following suggestion to the Greater London Authority:
Oliver Green, late of the Transport Museum, made the point that in the 1930s and 1940s the "bulls eye" trade mark of London Transport became regarded as the symbol of Greater London. This logo (I prefer to call it the "ring and bar") is indeed a practical heraldic device. In its simplicity, uniqueness, recognisability and versatility, it is much more in line with Scandinavian civic heraldry than with the gratuitous complexity of modern English civic heraldry. I propose that GLA should recognise its implicit historic association with Greater London by adopting a form of the Ring and Bar as its own device. If you settle on a colour scheme which TfL does not use and does not intend to use, and then reserve it for this purpose, this will both say "London" to everyone, and reinforce the association with the transport function. It is also suggestive of the metropolis encircling the river. I propose gold on purple, suggesting the centre of wealth and the seat of government. If you want to make a subtle distinction between GLA and TfL, extend the "bar" to the edges of the envelope.
As a flag, GLA need consult no-one about its use, though it might want to talk to the Flag Institute about registration. As a coat of arms, of course the College of Arms would need to be involved.
from Andrew Gray, the Heraldry Society
- Andrew Gray, Whitechapel E1, 17/08/2011 11:09
Report abuse
One big problem with this notion is that London really cannot be summed up in a single 'identity' - it's made up of a number of 'villages', each with a distinct identity of its own... If New York is 'the big apple', London is a 'fruit salad'... Brilliant. Will that do? Can I have the £2million?
- Nakki, London, 09/06/2009 13:46
Report abuse
A quite 'splendid' idea... this country's design consultancies should immediately divert all their already over-stretched, redundancy-hit resources into pitching to be involved in this completely pointless exercise in wasting public money, which would be better spent on almost anything... or just flush the money down the toilet (same effect).
- Nakki, London, 09/06/2009 09:55
Report abuse
£2 million! I voted Boris in to stop these "livingstone-esq" big spending on nonesense! The London embassies are still here, the tube is even more knackered ( with no hope in sight for funding air conditioning the trains due to the cancelling of the CO2 charge and the western extension), we have a "tree outside my hpouse please" hotline and now he's spending £2million just because the current branding was thought of by Ken's lot. More nonsense from Boris!
- Nathan, Barnet, 08/06/2009 13:58
Report abuse
We are talking £2m why should we spend that amount of money when the country is in such economic crisis? Crazy!!!!!!!!
- Rm, London, 08/06/2009 11:58
Report abuse
I'm with David on this. I think this is a splendid idea, and one that will put London on the map. However, £2M is not enough, and I would willingly pay much much more in council and income taxes to support this project's expansion. Projecting the 2012 logo onto the moon would be a start.
- C.Nichol, Some skint Tory-loving meejah agency, Clerkenwell, 04/06/2009 16:29
Report abuse
Perhaps Ritterband could spend our money more wisely, rather than wasting it on advertising...
I'd rather see the Mayor extend the bakerloo line down to lewisham via the old kent road/ new cross etc..
- Mike, london, 04/06/2009 15:54
Report abuse
David, are you off your head? £2m down the drain? London needs no further branding since it is a world class city. Enough said.
- Aj, London, UK, 04/06/2009 15:13
Report abuse
I hope they get rid of that daft LondON typography.
- John Punshon, Milton Keynes, England, 04/06/2009 12:32
Report abuse
I always assumed Boris was a cautious person when it came to spending public funds-obviously not-what an extravagant waste of money-someone has hit the jackpot.
- Harvey Lawrence, London, 04/06/2009 11:55
Report abuse
This is an absolutely outstanding idea from our Mayor who really does care about our future. The logo hopefully will incorporate what makes London special and I hope that Boris gets to put his ideas forward as well. Excellent work.
- David, Wesminster, 04/06/2009 10:03
Report abuse
