Morning:
8°c
Prince Charles asks council to pass his 'twee' design for palace
Robert Mendick, Chief Reporter26 Aug 2009
Prince Charles was accused today of intervening in the £12million plans for a redesign of Kensington Palace.
The Prince of Wales supports a design for a new entrance to the palace - once home to Princess Diana - which has been likened to "twee garden furniture" by its critics.
His charity The Prince's Foundation for the Built Environment has written to Kensington and Chelsea planners urging them to approve the scheme, designed by one of the prince's favourite architects, John Simpson.
Councillors, advised by planning officials to turn down the proposal as "detrimental" to the Grade-I listed palace, vote on it tonight.
The Standard understands that the prince has taken an enthusiastic role in overseeing the proposals for Kensington Palace, which is run by the Historic Royal Palaces organisation.
The agency is keen to push through the application to finish the project in time for the Queen's diamond jubilee in 2012. The Queen is understood to approve of the plans.
But objectors claim the cast-iron portico - or loggia - will ruin the east facade of the palace, commissioned by William III and Mary II in 1689 and designed by Sir Christopher Wren.
Daniel Moylan, the Conservative deputy leader of Kensington and Chelsea, told planning officials: "It [the loggia] is decoratively over-elaborate and almost embarrassingly twee and although designed by a leading architect, one could easily imagine it being replicated in a garden furniture catalogue." Other opponents include the Kensington Society, which called the design "too dominating and overly detailed", and the Society for the Protection of Ancient Buildings. However, English Heritage supports the plan.
Classical architect Mr Simpson was selected by a panel which included representatives of The Prince's Foundation. The foundation's design director, Ben Bolgar, urged planners to pass the scheme, saying: "We believe it [the loggia] would bring the palace to life once again and unite it with its much-loved gardens."
The foundation admitted today that it has commented on "only a couple" of planning applications in the past two years. But its chief executive Hank Dittmar defended the intervention: "Surely it is not surprising that The Prince's Foundation has been asked to help on one of the royal palaces."
John Barnes, director of conservation and learning at Historic Royal Palaces, said: "Every element of the scheme, including the loggia, has been carefully considered. The proposals are supported by national bodies, experts, community groups and local people."
Charles has come under fire for interfering in the modernist design of a £3billion development at Chelsea Barracks, which was scrapped.
Clarence House today denied the prince was trying to influence the design for Kensington Palace. A spokeswoman said: "The planning permission is obviously up to the council."
Reader views (6)
Looks nice. All this silly carping is wasting a lot of energy. Save it for the soccer game lads!
- Trunk, US, 26/08/2009 21:09
Report abuse
If English Heritage support the plan, then that's all that matters.
- Blue Baby, London, 26/08/2009 15:37
Report abuse
I think it looks beautiful, much better than the modern glass and steel ugly buildings that Ken Livingstone approved and destroyed London with.
- Sarah, London, 26/08/2009 14:20
Report abuse
It looks like a "monstrous carbuncle" to me.
- Judith, KIng's Lynn, Norfolk, UK, 26/08/2009 13:47
Report abuse
This proposed design for a 'portico' makes it look like the entrance to a railway station.
- Chris, Barbados, 26/08/2009 13:40
Report abuse
Daniel Moylan really should not be involving himself in this application. He is not a member of the Planning Committee and his attempt to sway the decision in this blatant manner is wrong.
A more serious point is his close friendship with Lord Rogers. Some more cynical than I could suggest that such a friendship demands that he
pour scorn on an application presented by an applicant(Prince Charles).Fortunately, I am convinced that would not be the case, however as I have said there are cynics who would question Daniel's intervention !
For we all know HRH championed the people's rejection of Roger's ghastly 'industrial' development of Chelsea Barracks
- Justin Downes Residents First, London, 26/08/2009 11:03
Report abuse
