Morning:
8°c
Revealed: How Jack Straw backed Gaddafi talks
Joe Murphy in London and Nabila Ramdani in Tripoli1 Sep 2009
The Government made no objections to the release of Lockerbie bomber Abdulbasset Ali al-Megrahi, according to ministerial letters released this afternoon.
In correspondence with their Scottish counterparts, London ministers repeatedly made clear that Edinburgh was free to decide on the issue, despite the certainty that releasing the terminally ill man would provoke a storm.
Justice Secretary Jack Straw “welcomed” talks between Edinburgh and Tripoli.
In a letter to Scottish First Minister Alex Salmond last November, he said: “You will be aware that Libyan concerns for Megrahi's health and possible returns to Libya remain.
“I would like to reassure you that [this is] a matter exclusively for Scottish ministers and Scottish courts respectively.
“In this vein I welcome the offer of your officials to continue talking to the Libyans about any matters in respect of this issue.”
The Straw letter makes clear that the demand for Megrahi's release on compassionate grounds was being discussed with Libya as far back as last year — and that London raised no objections.
The Scottish government said he was released on compassionate grounds but there have been claims of an “oil for freedom deal”.
The publication of the letters is an attempt by Downing Street to scotch the allegations.
On 3 August this year, Foreign Office Minister Ivan Lewis urged the Scottish government to consider Megrahi's release because he has prostate cancer.
After reassuring the Scots that they were not bound by a pledge given by Britain to America that Megrahi would serve a full prison term, he went on: “I hope on this basis you will now feel able to consider the Libyan application in accordance with the provisions of the prisoner transfer agreement.”
The Scottish executive is said to have interpreted this as urging approval.
Other letters confirmed that Mr Straw agreed to exclude Megrahi from a prisoner transfer deal in 2007 but changed his mind a month later.
At the time, the Government was under huge pressure from the Libyans and a multi-billion oil deal for BP was being held up by Tripoli.
The go-ahead for that was given three weeks after Mr Straw backed down but No 10 insists that was just a coincidence.
In a 2007 letter, former Lord Chancellor Lord Falconer referred to the review of the Megrahi case without expressing a view.
His letter to Mr Salmond concluded: “I am grateful for your confirmation for our shared interest in furthering co-operation with Libya.”
In December 2007, Mr Straw announced he would not, after all, exclude Megrahi from a prisoner transfer deal, opening the door to him being sent to Libya.
He added: “The wider negotiations with the Libyans are reaching a critical stage and in view of the overwhelming interests of the United Kingdom I have agreed the [agreement] should not mention any individual.”
Just three weeks later, the stalled BP deal went through.
Sections of some letters were redacted, while not all were published, leaving questions over what was missed out.
However, No 10 believed the letters showed there was never a “deal” to barter Megrahi's freedom in exchange for trade.
More documents were being released in Edinburgh tonight — including notes of a visit to Megrahi in prison by Scottish justice secretary Kenny MacAskill. Libya claimed this afternoon that Megrahi is close to death.
The terminally ill man whose triumphant return to Tripoli sparked an international crisis was said to be “deteriorating fast” just two weeks after his release.
Tripoli's propaganda chief Majid al-Dursi, when asked how long Megrahi could still have to live, answered: “Only God knows when it will be over. But he is dying now.”
There was no way to verify the health of Megrahi, 57, who has cancer, but there was speculation that Tripoli, after enraging the world by treating his release as a victory, was attempting to douse the issue by focusing on his illness.
Megrahi is the only person convicted of the 1988 bombing that killed 270 people.
Tonight he was due to be given a “starring role” in mass celebrations in Libya to mark Muammar Gaddafi's 40 years in power. Tory leader David Cameron called for a parliamentary inquiry to investigate.
Downing Street's official spokesman said that the letters were being published “in the interests of transparency” and hoped they would lay to rest claims that Britain connived in the release to protect trade deals.
The Government's discomfort is bound to increase if Libya goes ahead with a plan to make the freeing of Megrahi a centrepiece of the celebrations of Libyan revolution tonight.
Mr Cameron branded the affair a “fiasco” and dismissed the idea of compassionate grounds as “utterly bizarre”.
He said: “If the Government cannot or will not provide an honest and complete account, the only other option is the one the Conservatives are demanding — a full examination by the relevant select committees.”
But in an interview, Gordon Brown said: “I met Colonel Gaddafi at the G8 in Italy, and I made it absolutely clear to him then that this was not a decision — the future and fate of Mr Megrahi — that we as the United Kingdom could take.”
“It was a matter for the Scottish Executive, and it was their decision, and their decision alone that would decide it.”
Reader views (11)
Brown did not want this mass murderer to die in an English jail. I would be perfectly content to let Brown do just that, and the sooner the better
- Minority Working Person, London/England, 02/09/2009 02:54
Report abuse
Brown did not want this mass murderer to die in an English jail. I would be perfectly content to let Brown do just that, and the sooner the better
- Minority Working Person, London/England, 02/09/2009 02:53
Report abuse
Straw is a cunning man. Just the sort of guy you want in politics. Oh, that's right, he is in politics!
- Cyrjames, Berwick-Upon-Tweed, UK., 01/09/2009 23:28
Report abuse
our troops die while back home terrorists are freed early, blair, brown, labour this country is a joke! oil bent mp's if only i could afford to get out i would
- Mike, lndon, 01/09/2009 21:05
Report abuse
Packing as I read the article... Goodbye Third-World and the incompetent crooks at the helm, hello America and the 'torturing' crooks at the helm...
But, no TV licence, no council tax, no water rates based on the value of the property, no stamp duty, no 70p tax per litre, no zones 1 & 2, no moats, no chancellor flipping addresses to save on tax (go figure) and in the name of Desmond Tutu... No more Gordo & Lord Mandy of Regents Park...
- Andre, london, 01/09/2009 17:08
Report abuse
Blair was consulting specialist extradition lawyers over 2 years ago about returning him to Libya. As usual, the government is hiding the truth about the extent of their involvement. Heads will roll as more gets leaked. Watch this space...
- Commander Large, Paris, 01/09/2009 16:41
Report abuse
White wash at the ready, mandy in consultation with blair, brown awaiting instructions. Just more of the same Liebour, why do they bother no one believes their lies.
- Alan Davey, London UK, 01/09/2009 14:49
Report abuse
This won't happen, or even be said by anyone important, because we need trade with Libya and oil from Libya. But releasing the bomber on compassionate grounds should have been seen as a rebuke to the worst villain.
What the release of the Lockerbie bomber said, was that we recognise that he wasn't the author of this atrocity. His crime, like that of a concentration camp guard, was to do what he was told to do, possibly under duress. The worst criminal is the person who told him to do it, and that person will never be punished in this world.
- Nigel, London, 01/09/2009 13:18
Report abuse
Ha, ha, ha...........You really could not make this up could you?
The MP's really are taking us for idiots, still we can only wait in hope of a General Election!
- Mrs, London UK, 01/09/2009 12:29
Report abuse
Still, as long as they're getting cheap oil out of it.
- Bob, Cheam, 01/09/2009 12:03
Report abuse
It dosen't matter what correspondence is published - the real deals are done with a nod and a wink. Paper trails are specially designed to be ambiguous and confusing in order to avoid responsibility for their actions when they are caught out later.
The politicians are simply misleading the public, as usual, the compassionate grounds were perceived as being the most likely to be "swallowed" by the general population, that's all, nothing more to it really.
- Kris, London, 01/09/2009 11:43
Report abuse
