Morning:
6°c
Ronnie Biggs and Lockerbie bomber release link is 'ridiculous'
11 Sep 2009Suggestions that the decision to free Great Train Robber Ronnie Biggs was prompted by the impending release of the Lockerbie bomber were dismissed as "absurd and offensive".
Tory veteran Michael Howard has written to Home Secretary Jack Straw asking him to clarify whether the releases of Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed Al Megrahi and Biggs, both on compassionate grounds, were linked.
His letter suggests Mr Straw overturned a previous decision not to free Biggs because the Justice Secretary knew Megrahi was about to be returned to Libya by the Scottish Government.
Megrahi was released last month, eight years into a life sentence imposed for his part in the bombing of Pan Am flight 103 over Lockerbie in December 1988 which killed 270.
The former Conservative leader wrote that the sequence of events made it "very hard" to avoid the inference that the U-turn in the Biggs case had been influenced by Mr Straw's "knowledge of the likely decision of the Scottish Government in the Megrahi case.
"If this was indeed true, it would amount to a very serious breach of the principles you were, by law, required to apply in the Biggs case," he added.
Mr Howard said Mr Straw had originally refused to release Biggs because he had shown no remorse for his crimes, yet reversed the decision a month later.
"The reason for this change of mind on your part has never been satisfactorily explained," Mr Howard wrote.
"If Megrahi had been released on compassionate grounds so that he did not die in prison, while you adhered to your original decision in the Biggs case, the contrast would, of course, have been stark and obvious, particularly since Megrahi, like Biggs, had refused to express remorse for the crime of which he had been convicted."
But a spokesman for Mr Straw said there was "no connection at all between the two cases" and dismissed the claims as "ridiculous".
"The idea of any connection between the Biggs case and the release of Megrahi is preposterous, untrue, absurd and offensive," the spokesman said.
"As Jack said at the time of his decision, Ronnie Biggs was released on compassionate grounds after he considered the medical evidence against well-established criteria - specifically whether death was likely to occur soon and whether the prisoner was bedridden or severely incapacitated.
"These were different criteria to Mr Biggs' application for parole where the Justice Secretary refused parole principally because Mr Biggs had shown no remorse for his crimes nor respect for the punishments given to him.
"Megrahi was released by the Scottish Executive. That was their decision and their decision alone. Jack became aware of Al-Megrahi's release when he saw the news on the BBC website.
"There is no connection at all between the two cases. The suggestions being made by Mr Howard are ridiculous, entirely without foundation and extremely offensive."
Reader views (1)
When Ronnie Biggs was released my first instinct was to look for what this government was trying to knock off the front page. Now we get a government spokesperson calling any link "absurd and offensive", so therefore ones immediate thought is, it's true. What a pathetic troupe of clowns to have for a government if they think the populace can't see straight through them by now.
- Threaded, Roskilde, Denmark, 11/09/2009 08:51
Report abuse
