Marriage tax break plan condemned
17 Jan 2010- Greek parliament approves debt bill
- Public sector bonuses under review
- Adele reigns with six Grammy wins
- Magnificent seven for The Artist
- Coalition tensions exposed by Bill
- NHS output decline 'is a myth'
- Pakistan PM charged with contempt
- Salmond and Moore to discuss vote
- Murdoch 'facing US legal action'
- Drivers warned over icy conditions
Tory plans to give married couples a tax break have been described as "social engineering" by a Cabinet minister as the Government prepares to unveil a series of family-friendly policies.
Schools Secretary Ed Balls laid into David Cameron's pledge to recognise marriage financially, warning it would create a tier of "second class" families which risked stigmatising children.
Extra cash for the Relate service and a duty on public services to prioritise families were reported to be among measures to be promised by ministers in a Green Paper next week.
It will also include efforts to give more support to fathers, including a 10-page "New Dad's Guide" and new guidance to midwives on how to better engage with fathers.
As Labour drew battle lines with the Opposition on the issue, Mr Balls said it was vital for the state to recognise that good families came "in all shapes and sizes".
"The idea of trying to socially engineer family life through a tax policy which is designed to say that some types of families are first class, and other types of families are second class and should be financially disadvantaged, is hugely expensive and unfair," he said.
"The idea that you say to children who only have one parent because of bereavement or domestic violence, or to kids who have two parents, both of whom are divorced and who have a new family but don't want to or can't remarry that somehow you're not as good as another type of family is unfair. It could stigmatise children and I don't think that's right. I don't think children should be told they are second-class kids because of things which have happened through no fault of their own or unavoidable reasons."
Mr Balls, the husband of Work and Pensions Secretary Yvette Cooper, said he believed marriage remained "the best way to bring up children" but it was wrong to penalise other family units.
Mr Cameron was forced to renew his promise to deliver the tax break "within a Parliament" last week after appearing to downgrade the commitment to a "hope". He later issued a statement saying that the party was, in fact, pledged to deliver on the policy in its first term and said he had "messed up" by "misdescribing" the position.
Shadow chief secretary to the Treasury Philip Hammond defended the policy. He said: "Creating a framework of support for families is something that a strong and confident society should do, and that includes recognition of marriage in the tax system, respecting the importance of extended families, and acknowledging the value that stable families bring to our communities. There is plenty of evidence that being brought up in a stable family unit is one of the most important indicators of a child's future prospects. So encouraging stable families is a key tool in the fight against intergenerational poverty."
Reader views (7)
Social engineering?? An accusation levelled by this government? The loonies strike again.
- Frank, Home Counties, England., 17/01/2010 19:06
Report abuse
Anyting that repairs Britain's broken society is good. We have too many unemployed and state under-achievers.
- Jacqueline, Hampstead, London, 17/01/2010 19:04
Report abuse
Tax breaks for the married couples is not new. The best known marriage or partnership tax allowance comes in tax free assets that a spouse or a legalized partnership can inherit. So beware people the Labour party and the Liberal Democrats seem to be wanting to abolish marriage and all that is decent in society because they think it is unfair for people to be encouraged to take on and sustain family responsibility. Labour is the party of taxation and spending; this sends shivers down most people's spines that they will want to tax widows and widowers when their spouses are deceased. The most interesting piece in this saga is the squealing from a couple of politicians who are not in touch with the public and cannot wait to see how the tax break would be implimented. Anything that helps get and maintain stability into a child's life has my vote.
- Alexis Dogilewski, Kingston-upon-thames. England, 17/01/2010 15:19
Report abuse
Pot calling the kettle black springs to mind - it's this Government that is the absolute master in social engineering. All of their policies, ranging from university admissions to imigration are founded on just those principles that Balls now condemns. What a bloody hypocrite!!
- Nigel, St Albans, 17/01/2010 12:16
Report abuse
Ed Balls and anything social has to be a joke.As for social engineering which he should know about as it is the practice of the Labour Party in order to keep the poor in poverty and to maintain the class war.
- Alexis Dogilewski, Kingston-upon-thames. England, 17/01/2010 12:08
Report abuse
Labour accusing the Tories of social engineering? A case of pot/kettle me thinks.
- Janine, London, 17/01/2010 10:22
Report abuse
Abd these comunist that run our country would know all about "social engineering" for they have been doing it agaist the British for the past tweleve years
- Richard, LONDON, 17/01/2010 03:50
Report abuse
Afternoon:
7°c


