Tonight:
2°c
Footballer Wayne Bridge has demanded his ex-partner Vanessa Perroncel move out of the £3 million home where she allegedly conducted an affair with his former Chelsea team-mate John Terry.
Bridge's lawyers issued the notice to Ms Perroncel in a private High Court hearing over maintenance for their three-year-old son Jaydon.
Sources close to Bridge, 29, said the lingerie model is set to receive half of the £15,000 a month she had been seeking. Sources close to Ms Perroncel, 33, said Bridge had offered only £3,000 a month maintenance.
Reader views (7)
What after everything she has done for him?
What public humiliation, the fact that he can't go to a world cup with dignity, so what.
He should be grateful she didn't do a cry and tell to a newspaper, naturally he owes her big time.
- Doug, London, 26/03/2010 16:18
Report abuse
" ...half of the £15,000 a month she had been seeking"
..well, what do you expect? That nice Max Clifford fellow doesn't come cheap y'know
- Dixon Kipretich, Ugley, Essex, 26/03/2010 14:24
Report abuse
I am so glad that the person who is right in the middle of this soap style saga is at last getting some form of comeuppance.
John Terry was in the wrong, yes, but equally she knew that he was married, and wasn't exactly forced into this affair was she?
- Ronnie, what used to be England, 26/03/2010 14:00
Report abuse
Wayne Bridges son is entitled to same sort of lifestyle as his father, who clearly is not seeking custody, so as much as I dispise the mother and her motives; I see why the court will grant the money in the sons best interests.
- Dirk Diggler, Soho, London, 26/03/2010 13:25
Report abuse
Well done Wayne, all she is after is an easy life at your expense.
- Malc, London,England, 26/03/2010 13:06
Report abuse
Sorry I'm lost - Maintenance - Why?
- Norman, Eastcote, 26/03/2010 12:45
Report abuse
"only" £3,000 per month!
That is the equivalent of a £50k annual salary (and without the grind of a daily commute and long hours in the office - just quality time with her child).
Why the sense of entitlement to an excessivly lavish lifestyle on the basis that she has had a child with a high earner?
The majority of people raise a family perfectly well on much less than she will be getting (and juggle work with raising their family)!!!
- Susan, London, UK, 26/03/2010 12:02
Report abuse
