Whishaw caught in portrayal of betrayal
By
Nicholas de Jongh
31 Jul 2008
When Katie Mitchell brings the violence and horrors of ancient Greek drama to the National Theatre's stage, I rate her as a more original, exciting and imaginative director than any rival working upon the English stage. Yet her latest production, which involves those classic elements of the murder of a much desired woman, a weird love triangle and betrayal, by way of Dostoyevsky's 19th century masterpiece The Idiot, leaves me bemused, confused and deeply unenthused.
... some trace of her - note those pretentious dots - distills the novel's 800 pages into an 80-page script and 90 minute's playing time. This, though, is no miracle of compression. Dostoyevsky's book just about disappears from dramatised view - being shot to pieces and tiny, splintered shards of it hurled on stage in a ceaseless, multi-media rush of video and theatre images, of strange sounds and quartet music. The original narrative vanishes clean away to be replaced by these dislocated fragments.
Those unfamiliar with the novel will find themselves caught in a hopeless struggle to gather what is happening to Ben Whishaw ' s simple-minded, Christ-like Prince Myshkin, who has all his wits about him yet comes both to grief and the attention of Hattie Morahan's inscrutable Nastasya. "I want to find the key to the whole mystery," Whishaw intones mysteriously at the start in that lugubrious voice of his, all intense and monotoned as he presents a wish-list of his life aspirations.
Whishaw, who was a powerful Hamlet four years ago at the age of 23, reappears again and again, but momentarily epileptic, dining, coming under Nastasya's sway, sweating with emotion. We last see him come full circle and delivering the same wish-list.
The image of a woman dead in her wedding dress, with the two men who loved her on either side serves as the inspiration for the evening's mood of doleful reminiscence. Poems by the death-obsessed Emily Dickinson are spliced between scenes, though to what purpose I am unsure.
Dickinson's I Heard A Fly Buzz When I Died might echo the death scene in the novel when the Prince is shown Natasya's corpse and is distracted by the buzzing of a fly.
Not for nothing is ... some trace of her described in the programme as being "inspired by Dostoevsky". For this is Mitchell in her latest, perversely experimental form, drawing theatre and film into a strange marriage as in her extraordinary recreation of Virginia Woolf 's The Waves: the stage is forever packed with scurrying actors whose duty it is to speak voice-overs, to light, arrange and even film the fragmentary scenes that are both acted on stage and relayed, in subtly altered form, on the large video screen above. I found myself once again, as with The Waves, constantly distracted watching the process of arranging each film shot and comparing it with what you see on video.
Miss Mitchell strikes me as being caught in a creative cul de sac. ...some trace of her is not so much about Dostoevsky's novel as the mental pictures, images and feelings it evokes in her mind. It's an aesthete's evening of passionate self-absorption.
Details are correct at the time of publication - please check with venue before booking.
Reader views (1)
Katie Mitchell is a genius. And only a genius could have failed so spectacularly.
The kindest thing one can say about ‘….some trace of her’ is that it is a bold experiment. The actors move busily on stage, in the dark like demented ants, trying to create ephemeral images to be captured by digital cameras and projected onto a screen. This perhaps can best be described as live cinema. A concept whose time has come, you might say. True. But not in this form.
The problem with the show is that the story comes to us in little –interrupted- snippets. We are unable to sympathise with or be engaged by the protagonists because we are constantly made aware of the artifice of the situation. You have to really know what you are doing, as Brecht does, in order to risk taking the audience out of the action. And applying Brechtian techniques to the telling of a Dostoyevsky story doesn’t strike me as being necessary.
I don’t mind bold experiments. I just don’t want to pay £27 to watch them at the Cottesloe.
Will this stop me from going to see the next Katie Mitchell show? Absolutely not!
But next time, I’ll wait for the reviews to come out first.
- Mykingdomforaseagull, Bucharest, Romania, 01/08/2008 16:53
Report abuse
Tonight:
5°c















