Ayckbourn is Taking Steps in the new age
By
Henry Hitchings
29 Mar 2010
Alan Ayckbourn is enjoying a renaissance. Between 2003 and 2007 none of his plays was put on in the West End; in 1975 he had five running there simultaneously. But of late the acclaimed staging of The Norman Conquests at the Old Vic, together with several other successful revivals, has inspired new interest in a writer whose productivity has sometimes caused him to be undervalued.
Taking Steps is a farce from the Seventies — a portrait of dysfunctional suburbanites, directed by Ayckbourn himself. It’s nicely observed and, at times, raucously funny; amid the domestic carnage there is some silvery writing about strained relationships.
Events take place across three floors of a house near Maidenhead. There’s no triple-decker set but the different strands of action are presented on the same stage, concurrently. This proves a source of rich visual comedy.
The characters appear trapped by their mannerisms, mostly to amusing effect, and the performances are vigorous, with Michael Simkins especially good as self-important Roland. Anna Francolini is vividly anxious as his wife, and there’s a delightfully gormless turn by Matthew Cottle as their blundering solicitor.
If you’re looking for belly laughs and the ludicrous, Taking Steps will deliver. But it prompts a sobering thought. “New comedy” today means stand-up more often than drama. Our masters of comic theatre — Ayckbourn, Tom Stoppard, Michael Frayn — are in their seventies. Where are the successors?
Until 28 May. Info: 020 8940 3633.
Details are correct at the time of publication - please check with venue before booking.
Reader views (1)
I saw a matinee performance of this last week, and was lucky enough to hear a post-performance discussion between Sir Alan and the audience. What comes over is a man of 70, who had a stroke, and walks with the aid of a stick, utterly dedicated to writing and to the projects he plans to complete. His energy and passion was there for all to see. What a writer. What a craftsman. I think a lot of people do not regard Ayckbourn as cool enough, not arty, not of today, of another age. But the fact is that the audience loved it, and loved him, because both he and his plays are 'entertaining'. And when it comes down to it, isn't that what is really important?
- Roger Goldsmith, Southsea, UK, 29/03/2010 18:52
Report abuse
Tonight:
2°c













